Talk:Appmon (Species)

List of App/Ability Icons/Checklist

Appmon	Icon	App	Grade	Type	Power
Addmon		Address Book (アドレス帳)	Standard		320
Aidmon		Rescue (救命)	Standard		490
Auctiomon		Auction (オークション)	Standard		130
Batterimon		Battery (バッテリー)	Standard		190
Beautymon		Beauty (美容)	Ultimate		45000
Biomon		Life (ライフ)	Ultimate		70000
Bookmon		eBook (電子書籍)	Standard		620
Bootmon		Super Boot (超起動)	Ultimate		57000
Bramon		Brain Training (脳トレ)	Super		5000
Calcumon		Calculator (電卓)	Standard		220
Calendamon		Calendar (カレンダー)	Standard		170
Callmon		Phone (電話)	Standard		520
Cameramon		Camera (カメラ)	Standard		1200
Cardmon		Card (カード)	Standard		650
Charismon		Mind Control (マインドコントロール)	Ultimate		55000
Coachmon		Training (育成)	Super		6000
Cometmon		Astrology (天体)	Ultimate		65000
Compassmon		Compass (コンパス)	Standard		230
Consulmon		Saving (節約)	Super		6400
Cookmon		Cook (お料理)	Standard		200
Coordemon		Coordinate (コーディネート)	Super		9600
Copipemon		Copy & Paste (コピペ)	Standard		710
Craftmon		Design (設計)	Super		7200
Damedamon		Dame Dame (ダメダメ)	Ultimate		38000
Dancemon		Rhythm (リズム)	Standard		440
Dantemon	File:Dantemon icon.png	Open (開放)			77777
Denpamon		Communication (通信)	Standard		680
Deusumon		Omnipotence (全能)	God		340000
Dezipmon		Zip/Unzip (圧縮解凍)	Super		10500
Diarimon		Diary (日記帳)	Standard		180
Dicemon		Dice (サイコロ)	Standard		120
Docmon		Doctor (ドクター)	Super		8800
Dogamon		Video (動画)	Standard		740
Dogatchmon		Super Search (超検索)	Super		7500
Dokamon		Action (アクション)	Standard		900
Dopemon		Enhancement (増強)	Standard		360
Dosukomon		Fighting (格闘)	Super		11000
Drawmon		Paint (ペイント)	Standard		800
Dreammon		Dream (夢)	Super		7800
Dressmon		Fashion (ファッション)	Standard		240
Ecomon		Energy Saving (省エネ)	Standard		100
Effecmon		Effect (エフェクト)	Super		7000
Entermon		Entertainment (エンターテイメント)	Ultimate		42000
Fakemon		Camouflage (偽装)	Ultimate		50000
Flickmon		Flick (フリック)	Standard		8
Gaiamon		Creation (創造)	God		300000
Gashamon		Gasha (ガシャ)	Standard		300
Gatchmon		Search (検索)	Standard		1000
Gengomon		Translation (翻訳)	Standard		460
Globemon		Global (グローバル)	Ultimate		60000
Gomimon		Trashbin (ゴミ箱)	Standard		10
Gossipmon		Gossip (ゴシップ)	Super		4800
Gugumon	File:Gugumon icon.png	Search (検索)	Standard		1100
Hackmon		Hacking (ハッキング)	Standard		1400
Hadesmon		Variation (変化)	God		315000
Jammingmon		Jamming (ジャミング)	Standard		930
Jetmon		Flight (フライト)	Standard		1100
Jishomon		Dictionary (辞書)	Standard		680
Jumpplusmon	File:Jumpplusmon icon.png	Jumpplus (ジャンプ＋)	Standard		550
Kabemon		Wallpaper (壁紙)	Standard		140
Kaimon		Shopping (ショッピング)	Standard		330
Kakeimon		Account Book (家計簿)	Standard		210
Kosomon		Gossip Review (裏口コミ)	Standard		230
Libramon		Library (図書館)	Super		5400
Lightmon		Light (ライト)	Standard		150
Logamon		Logoff (ログオフ)	Super		7200
Logimon		Login (ログイン)	Super		7200
Luckmon		Slot (スロット)	Standard		777
Mailmon		Mail (メール)	Standard		510
Mcmon		Broadcasting (実況)	Standard		780
Mediamon		Media Player (メディアプレーヤー)	Super		5800
Medicmon		Medical (メディカル)	Super		8000
Messemon		Message (メッセージ)	Standard		500
Mienumon		Stealth (ステルス)	Super		8400
Mirrormon		Mirror (ミラー)	Standard		700
Moneymon		eMoney (電子マネー)	Standard		110
Musclemon		Muscle Training (筋トレ)	Standard		920
Musimon		Music (音楽)	Standard		880
Navimon		Navi (ナビ)	Standard		560
Newsmon		News (ニュース)	Standard		390
Offmon		Offline (オフライン)	Standard		950
Onmon		Online (オンライン)	Standard		950
Onpamon		Ultrasound (超音波)	Standard		580
Oujamon		Battle (戦闘)	Ultimate		95000
Ouranosmon		Arousal (覚醒)	God		290000
Pekomon		Compression (圧縮)	Standard		80
Perorimon		Gourmet (グルメ)	Standard		690
Pipomon		Warning (注意報)	Standard		950
Pokomon		Decompression (解凍)	Standard		80
Poseidomon		Invincible (無敵)	God		270000
Protecmon		Security (セキュリティ)	Standard		750
Puzzlemon		Puzzle (パズル)	Standard		350
Racemon		Race (レース)	Standard		550
Raidramon		Super Hacking (超ハッキング)	Super		12500
Rebootmon		Reboot (再起動)	God		280000
Recomon		Recording (録音)	Standard		290
Resshamon		Transfer (乗換)	Standard		720
Reviewmon		Review (口コミ)	Standard		250
Revivemon		Restoration (復元)	Ultimate		78000
Roamon		Voice Change (ボイスチェンジ)	Super		4400
Rocketmon		Rocket (ロケット)	Standard		1600
Ropuremon		Ropure (ロープレ)	Standard		1500
Sakusimon		Simulation (シミュレーション)	Super		14000
Santamon	File:Santamon icon.png	Christmas (クリスマス)	Super		12250
Sateramon		GPS (GPS)	Ultimate		100000
Savemon		Backup (バックアップ)	Standard		1100
Scorpmon		Monitoring (監視)	Super		13000
Setmon		Setup (設定)	Standard		50
Shotmon		Shooting (シューティング)	Standard		1300
Shutmon		Forced Termination (強制終了)	Ultimate		57000
Sleepmon		Sleep (睡眠)	Standard		270
Sociamon		SNS (SNS)	Super		6800
Spamon		Spa (温泉)	Standard		260
Speciamon	File:Speciamon icon.png	Secret (機密)	Ultimate		100000
Sukasimon		Failed (スカ)	Super		4000
Supermon	File:Supermon icon.png	Super (スーパー)	Super		10000
Supplemon		Supple (サプリ)	Standard		310
Swipemon		Swipe (スワイプ)	Standard		8
Tapmon		Tap (タップ)	Standard		8
Tarotmon		Super Fortune Telling (超占い)	Super		11500
Tellermon		Fortune Telling (占い)	Standard		400
Timemon		Time Slip (タイムスリップ)	Super		10000
Trickmon		Trick (手品)	Standard		530
Tripmon		Trip (旅行)	Super		6200
Tubumon		Tweet (つぶやき)	Standard		480
Tutomon		Commentary (解説)	Standard		200
Uratekumon		Hints and Tips (攻略)	Super		9000
Vegasmon		Roulette (ルーレット)	Super		9800
Virusmon		Virus (ウィルス)	Standard		640
Vjumpmon	File:Vjumpmon icon.png	V Jump (Ｖジャンプ)	Super		5500
Warpmon		Transmission (転送)	Super		12000
Warudamon		Strategy (策略)	Ultimate		88000
Watchmon		Watch (時計)	Standard		160
Weatherdramon		Climate (天候)	Super		15000
Weathermon		Weather (天気)	Standard		1050
Yadomon		Hotel (ホテル)	Standard		470

List of Types

Type	Japanese	Icon	Strong Against	Weak Against
Social	ソシャール		Navi	Life
Navi	ナビ		Tool	Social
Tool	ツール		System	Navi
System	システム		Game	Tool
Game	ゲーム		Entertainment	System
Entertainment	エンタメ		Life	Game
Life	ライフ		Social	Entertainment
God	ゴッド

Power Chart

Social > Navi > Tool > System > Game > Entertainment > Life > Social

Attribute or Type?

Although this parameter has currently been referred to as "Type", the kanji used for it is the same as what is used for the Digimon parameter. Should we use "Attribute" or continue using "Type"? --Ainz ^{( talk | contribs )} 09:22, 21 July 2016 (CDT)

AppLink Uniqueness?

Should the different AppLink have their own page, or instead they should be merged with their respective base Appmon page (e.g. DoGatchmon Plus Dokamon just considered as DoGatchmon, or even a different kind of DoGatchmon within the same page)? In my case, I definetely opt for the latter. As far as I've seen of Cyber Arena, any Appmon can be combined with any other one by AppLink, so doesn't this take away their required uniqueness in order to be considered as a separate Digimon species? Just a thought. In any case I think it is an unprecedented case within the franchise. What do you think on this matter guys? --Shadow Shinji (talk) 11:35, 20 September 2016 (CDT)

idk about the others, but I agree with treating Applinked Appmon as just as extension of the original; so far they don't even have any differences from the original except another Appmon tagging along and being able to use its attacks? --Garmmon (talk) 09:17, 21 September 2016 (CDT)

Since AppLink is possible between all Appmon I think we should treat it as a general Appmon ability. Having the process being described on the Appmon page should suffice. ShikaSS (talk) 10:58, 21 September 2016 (CDT)

I also agree, the only form of Applinkng we should be really concerned with, espeically now, is App-fusion. As for stuff like card pages e.g. Dogatchmon Plus Dokamon, we could still have a category for cards with that name, but make it a subcategory of the original's. --Ainz ^{( talk | contribs )} 11:15, 21 September 2016 (CDT)

There seems to be a special kind of AppLink, based on this video. "Chou Gattai (超合体)" is what it's called but I think we'd rather wait for more info about it. Just wanted to throw it out there.ShikaSS (talk) 05:31, 1 December 2016 (CST)

Strictly speaking, we've already seen this in the anime with Gatchmon getting both Dokamon's fists when Eri was introduced and later Roleplaymon's sword, shield, and cape when the Appmon had their contest.
That being said I would not consider forms that result from this unique species since this seems more like an advanced form of AppLink that only superficially resembles actual AppFusion. Chimera-gui (talk) 16:54, 9 December 2016 (CST)

Chou Gattai AppLink

I feel like these "Chou Gattai (超合体)" AppLinks mentioned above are noteworthy enough to at least be mentioned on their respective Appmon's pages. As it stands, the only way to find them is to pour through all the cards and Appmon Chips on their respective pages. (Except for Gatchmon Plus Ropuremon, which isn't mentioned on any page on the entire wiki...) I would like to add a Chou Gattai AppLink section to each Appmon's page, listing their available Chou Gattai AppLinks, if that is acceptable? I feel it would make that information more readily available to people using this Wiki. There are also some of these Chou Gattai AppLinks that can evolve/AppFuse directly from the Appmon who make up the base Appmon in the card game. I wonder if they should be listed separately in the evolutions section? I went ahead and editted Gatchmon's page as a sort of proof of concept, to show what I mean. If this is acceptable, I can go ahead and do this for all the Appmon. If there is anything I need to change, feel free to let me know. I had also considered just adding the Chou Gattai AppLinks to the Evolutions section directly, with (Chou Gattai AppLink) or (Applink). If something like that may be better? KiraraKidohara (talk) 17:22, 23 April 2022 (CDT)

The Appmon Chip Encyclopedia makes it very clear that Chou Gattai AppLink is only a visual modification of regular Applink since clicking the Chou Gattai AppLink chips just goes to the original base Appmon's species page (e.g. clicking the Dosukomon Plus Navimon chip goes to base Dosukomon's species page) and Applink itself was accepted as a general Appmon ability and thus AppLinks were deemed not unique enough to be listed.
Please revert everything you just did until someone in charge allows this. Chimera-gui (talk) 00:30, 24 April 2022 (CDT)

Oh. I thought the above was saying that they were considered not unique enough to have their own pages. I didn't see anything saying they weren't unique enough to even be listed anywhere... I thought them not being listed made the Appmon sections seem incomplete, since they are relevant information. Seems weird to not have them so much as mentioned anywhere, since they do have unique designs. It's just lacking information for the sake of lacking information. But, I'll undo it tomorrow, then. It's getting late here. Before I go to bed, is there someone in charge in particular that I'm supposed to ask about this? KiraraKidohara (talk) 01:07, 24 April 2022 (CDT)

I decided to go ahead and start tonight, and finished undoing the edits before bed. So, the pages are back to normal, as per your request. I still want to make clear that I think by removing this information, I have made the pages less useful, and have removed accurate and relevant information. I think listing these unique AppLinks would be beneficial to these pages, which is why I added the info in the first place. I wasn't trying to undermine anyone, I just thought I was adding useful info to the page, like any other edit. I am sorry if I wasn't supposed to. I guess this section is now my formal request to be permitted to add this information to the relevant pages, as I see it as worthwhile information that users would appreciate having easier access to. If there is a more appropriate place to ask for said permission, I would appreciate being pointed in that direction, please. KiraraKidohara (talk) 01:37, 24 April 2022 (CDT)

Hmmm, it looks like we don’t have an Applink page here. That seems like it’d be a better place to list Chou Gattai so they’d all be together just as the DigiXros page lists Digixroses together. Would that be acceptable to you? Chimera-gui (talk) 03:56, 24 April 2022 (CDT)

Personally, I still think them being listed on their related Appmon's pages somehow would be the best option, since it is relevant information about those Appmon, but I would be very happy as long as the information was readily and easily available somewhere on this wiki. I have been using this wiki for many years, long before I became an editor here, and I have always found these unique AppLinks being unlisted to be extremely disappointing. Which is why I tried to add them yesterday. I imagined other Appmon fans, like myself, would appreciate that information being easier to find.

But, as for making the AppLink page, I am a pretty new editor here. I wouldn't even begin to know how to do that. The only pages I've ever made is simple stuff like Digital Monster Vital Bracelet Attributes and Levels and similar pages used for v-pet Jogress reference. I imagine a page on AppLinking would require more than just a list like that. KiraraKidohara (talk) 04:11, 24 April 2022 (CDT)

How is this: AppLink? KiraraKidohara (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2022 (CDT)

I don't mean to seem argumentative or anything, but I am very slow at forming my thoughts properly, so it just occurred to me that what you're saying basically boils down to: Gatchmon Plus Ropuremon is just a Gatchmon, not a separate Appmon, and therefore it shouldn't be referenced on Gatchmon's page at all. (I understand that is an exaggeration of your point.) But, shouldn't the opposite be true? If Gatchmon Plus Ropuremon is just Gatchmon, isn't Gatchmon's page the 1 place it should have its info, just like Shadow Shinji mentioned above? When you first told me to undo my edits, you said "AppLinks were deemed not unique enough to be listed", but that is not what the above discussion seemed to deem from what I'm reading. The above discussion was about whether they should have their own pages, and the idea of including them on the relevant pages was even brought up as an alternative. I'm not trying to argue, just trying to thoroughly explain what I mean, since I sometimes have trouble explaining things. My edits last night were faulty. In retrospect, including them in the evolution section was just me overthinking things. I should have just kept it a simple list of Chou Gattai AppLinks. Again, the point of this wall of text was just to better explain my point, after having time to think it through more. You said I should wait for someone in charge. Ainz was a part of the above discussion, and they are a bolded user, so I guess they qualify? So, I am also going to bring this up to them, to try and get their opinion as well, since they were a part of the original conversation. I hope that is okay? I am not trying to "go over your head" or anything like that. This just seems like the most logical course of action considering your own suggestion. I am still open to dialogue with you as well. I'm not storming off. Just bringing more voices into the conversation. KiraraKidohara (talk) 07:16, 24 April 2022 (CDT)

You know what, nevermind. I don't handle stressful situations well, and this has had me sick all night... I give up. I don't have any hard feelings, I even understand your points, and think maybe my idea could've used some more refinement, now. But, I just can't handle confrontation/debate well... It's too hard on me. I'm not upset with you, or anything, I just can't handle situations like this... They make me sick. Sorry. Thanks for your help. I'm just glad these variants are acknowledged somewhere on the wiki now. I just have to stop trying, or I'm just going to stay sick like this. It's nothing you did, it's just me. You were very cordial. But, even just trying to explain myself is too much for me. Sorry for being a nuisance. KiraraKidohara (talk) 09:54, 24 April 2022 (CDT)

Regarding Appmon Romanization

I've been noticing lately that some of the rōmajis that the anime of Appli Monsters has been providing to us so far have some incosistencies, being the most notable ones Ropuremon, Scorpmon, and more recently, Weatherdoramon. Let's analyze each one:

• Ropuremon: basically comes from rōrupureingu, which is the literal transliteration in Japanese of Roleplaying. This doesn't make sense to me. It is as fucked up as Lilismon, which instead of a romanization, seems more like a pronunciation tip.
• Scorpmon: A misspeling of scope, which is clearly the concept in which its design is based on. So I don't understand the need of this awkard misspeling...
• Weatherdoramon: probably the most alarming one. There a lots of -dramon (ドラモン) alongside the entire franchise, but still they have romanized the name as -doramon for some reason.

As far as we know, like a half of the existing Appmon's names (without taking God Appmon into account) are based on Japanese concepts (Yadomon, Resshamon), while almost the other half is based on English words (Dressmon, Hackmon), and there are just a few of them that are based in words from any other languages (like Dezipmon or Vegasmon). My point is that the Japanese ones that have made an appearance in the show so far, are at least properly spelled, while there are others from English origin like the ones I've mentioned, that not exactly. And considering that Bandai is very fond of Engrish sometimes, do we want to follow this way of naming strictly? In my opinion, we should wait till more potential products come out and later decide something, but anyways I'd love to hear your thoughts. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 10:38, 8 March 2017 (CST)

Is it really that much of an issue? It's a name for a fictional creature, I don't think it matters whether or not it is written correctly. Oh, and "ropure" is an actual slang abbreviation for "rōrupureingu" so it's probably not a mistake. ShikaSS (talk) 15:54, 8 March 2017 (CST)

I feel like it should be noted that Scorpmon could be a reference to the Scorpio(n), a sniper weapon from the Roman Empire. Chimera-gui (talk) 16:46, 8 March 2017 (CST)

Programming Languages

What's the source on those? It should probably be cited. --TMS (talk) 12:44, 11 January 2026 (EST)

The characters that are shown among the upper-level Appmon bodies, the same way you can recognize the binary code and wireframe in the body of WarGreymon. I checked several screenshots of the anime series from a few different Appmon with some help, not all of them, but the common pattern I noticed is the one I specified on the page, which mirrors quite efficiently how most actual Smartphones apps are made of. Funnily enough, there are also some commands that seem to be made up or at least I wasn't able to recognize, I am not sure if that particular info is relevant enough to be covered on the main page.--Shadow Shinji (talk) 13:50, 11 January 2026 (CST)

1. C-style languages (C / C++ / Java)

• Intensive use of: { }, ;, (), operators such as +, -, =
• Uppercase words separated by symbols
• Structures reminiscent of code blocks
• Real example (C / Java): if (core == ACTIVE) { process_data(); }
• The use of curly braces {} is highly characteristic of C-style languages
• The semicolon ; as a statement terminator is typical of: C, C++, Java, C#
• It emulates low- to mid-level compiled languages as a metaphor for a "system core"

2. Pseudocode and generic programming keywords

• Terms as the following can be observed: CORE, APP, FRAME, PROCESS, DATA, MODE
• Combined with symbols that are not strictly valid in real syntax
• Real example (pseudocode): PROCESS CORE LOAD APP EXECUTE FRAME
• These words do not belong to any single specific programming language
• They are universal conceptual terms in computing designed to be readable and evocative

3. Scripting / high-level languages (Python / Lua inspiration)

• In some areas there is reduced presence of semicolons, more “linear” sequences
• Lack of rigid structural markers, instruction flow
• Real example (Python): if core_active: load_app()
• Aesthetic resembles Ptython: interpreted languages & control scripts
• The concept of smartphone apps aligns thematically with scripting languages

4. Assembly / low-level language (assembly-like)

• On several panels, we can see the following compact symbol blocks:
  • Compact symbol blocks
  • Abbreviations
  • Cryptic structures
  • Low human readability
• Real example (Assembly): MOV, 0xAF, BX, ADD, AX, 01, FF, 10, JMP, CORE
  
• The design conveys the idea of "machine-level code": assembly = core / system
• It attempts to evoke low-level programming, close to assembly, rather than readable source code

5. Regular expressions and logical symbols

• Presence of symbols such as: *, +, |, ()
• Repetitive symbol sequences
• Real example (Regex): [A-Z]+_CORE.*
• This combination strongly suggest regex
• It conveys ideas of: filtering, pattern matching, conditional logic
• Clear inspiration from regular expressions and symbolic logic, even though the patterns are not functionally valid regex

6. Markup languages (XML / HTML inspiration)

• In some panels, it can be perceived: angular, paired structures, symmetry, hierarchical organization
• Real example (XML): <core> <app status="active"/> </core>
• XML/HTML are languages associated with: structure, data organization
• Although explicit < > symbols are not always present, the visual organization strongly suggests them
• This represents aesthetic inspiration from markup languages, not literal usage

7. JSON-like notation / data structures

• Present in a limited or subtle manner:
  • Key–value pairs
  • Use of {} as data containers
• Real example (Json): { power: 120, mode: "active" }
• This connects to: application configuration & internal state representation

--Shadow Shinji (talk) 05:09, 19 January 2026 (CST)

3DS game Attributes

In the 3DS game, each attribute supports a distinct playstyle:

• Social (Blue): Excels at working with other attributes, often providing stronger Link effects.
• Navi (Green): Focuses on speed and physical offense, with mechanics tied to turn order, accuracy, and evasion.
• Tool (Purple): Specializes in utility, featuring effects like counters and bonus damage against certain enemies.
• System (Yellow): Built around defense, using barriers, damage reduction, and other protective effects.
• Game (Orange): Performs especially well in monotype decks, enhancing other Game-type cards.
• Entertainment (Red): Strong at dealing special damage and increasing stats.
• Life (Pink): Centers on healing and applying status-related effects.