User talk:Shadow Shinji

Could you set up "The Three Musketeers" group page with MagnuKidmon, BelleStarrmon, and Gundramon?

Done ;)

RaptorSparrowmon

Do you have the Bandai artwork for RaptorSparrowmon?

No sorry I don't.

Images

Please stop removing categories from images. It is also unnecessary to upload the same exact image repeatedly. --devkyu (talk) 03:31, 16 June 2014 (CDT)

Citation

Hello, can you add the source for Jokermon evolving to Piemon, please? --Grandy02 (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2014 (CDT)

It seemed that the Collectors profile says something about it, but it isn't sure so I haven't given any reference, thus anyone could help. Shadow Shinji (talk) 13:26, 4 July 2014 (CDT)

In the Collectors, Jokermon cannot evolve to Piemon, Please undo. --Yottamon (talk) 21:16, 4 July 2014 (CDT)

Artwork

That was not the official artwork of BelleStarrmon I had just deleted. It was just a Collectors card with a whiten-out background.

Okey, I didn't noticed that. Anyway, until its official artwork is available I think it's a good alternative. Shadow Shinji (talk) 10:42, 9 July 2014 (CDT)

Collectors and Fortune artwork

Never mind, I actually wanted to ask Charles.929 about this, but maybe you know, too? --Grandy02 (talk) 13:05, 12 July 2014 (CDT)

Not really :( Shadow Shinji (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2014 (CDT)

Okay. By the way, how do you get the Crusader artwork, directly from the game or through a third-party site? --Grandy02 (talk) 05:58, 17 July 2014 (CDT)

Through a third-party site :) Shadow Shinji (talk) 05:22, 19 July 2014 (CDT)

Digimon Collectors

Did Collectors get terminated yet or is it still operating?

It is still operating until tomorrow at 14:00 pm. Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:42, 30 July 2014 (CDT)

Digimon Collectors

14:00 pm is 2:00 pm over there in Japan, right?

Re: Digimon Crusader

Sorry, I don't know of any sites. --Ainz ^{( talk | contribs )} 16:47, 26 August 2014 (CDT)

Re: DigiLetters

Do you have an image of that particular scene? --Ainz ^{( talk | contribs )} 19:15, 7 September 2014 (CDT)

Re: Double Notes

I have fixed the double notes problem on Grand Dracumon for you. --Jun (talk) 10:44, 1 October 2014 (CDT)

Thanks :) Shadow Shinji (talk) 11:29, 1 October 2014 (CDT)

Re: Digimon Boxes

Which boxes? Could you send me a link/give an example? --Ainz ^{( talk | contribs )} 18:25, 1 November 2014 (CDT)

I don't know how but now it is solved. Anyway I'll give an example. In the case of Dark Lizamon#TCG, he only appears in the Hyper Colosseum, so the box that contains the name of the card game was abnormally expanded like if he appears in every card game, such as the case of Lilithmon#TCG. Now that is fixed, The box has a similar size to the one containing the names of the card (St-145 in the case of Dark Lizarmon). I hope my explanation was helpful.
Shadow Shinji (talk) 10:06, 2 November 2014 (CST)

Redirects

Hey, why are you recreating those redirects? They aren't needed, and were deleted for a reason. Anime... PAWĀ!!! 20:01, 14 November 2014 (CST) Ok, sorry then. I just did it because I figured that in the pages List of Digimon, Visual List and Dub Names List were a lot of broken links that hadn't a reason to exist. Shadow Shinji (talk) 04:14, 15 November 2014 (CST)

Official images

Hey, where did you get these official XW images? Can you link it to me? Anime... PAWĀ!!! 16:52, February 11, 2015 (UTC)

I extracted them from a fb account in which isn't quoted any official source. Shadow Shinji (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2015 (CST)

Can you link that Facebook account to me? Anime... PAWĀ!!! 16:21, 17 February 2015 (CST)

Of course: https://www.facebook.com/Digisoul.net Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2015 (CST)

Re: Romanization

It depends on what comes after the "ウ"; if the vowel that follows the "ウ" is lowercase then it will use "W" and "U" otherwise. For example, ウィング being romanized as "wingu" in contrast to ウイング being romanized as "uingu". --Ainz ^{( talk | contribs )} 11:16, 22 May 2015 (CDT)

Profiles

I'm going back through and checking many of the profiles I hadn't already done. Can you confirm whether you posted profiles for anyone other than GranGeneramon, Pajiramon, and Luminamon?KrytenKoro06 (talk) 12:24, 30 November 2015 (CST)

Right now I can't remember another one, but I'll tell you if so. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2015 (CST)

YouTube embedded vids for News/News archive

Just to make things simpler, I've changed the yt template so that you only need add the url part for News/News Archive vids. --Ainz ^{( talk | contribs )} 13:33, 21 February 2016 (CST)

Dub Name

Where are you getting these dub names? Is there a list of English name for the D-Spirit? Chimera-gui (talk) 23:47, 6 February 2017 (CST)

I've found some of them in several sources here and there;

D-Spirit 1

• No.462 EbiBurgermon (Ebi Burgamon)
• No.463 HamBurgermon (Burgamon)
• No.464 Torikaramon (Torikara Ballmon)
• No.465 Yamon (Yarmon)
• No.479 Fiendmon (Boogiemon)

Source

• No.506 Darukumon (Darcmon)
• No.508 Murumukusumon (Murmukusmon)
• No.509 Onisumon (Ornismon)
• No.511 Arukadhimon (Rookie~Mega)
• No.512 Sutorabimon (Strabimon)
• No.513 Pail Volcanomon (Pile Volcamon)

Source

• No.523 Raihimon (Rhihimon)

Source

D-Spirit 2

• No.562 TigerVespinemon (TigerVespamon)
• No.563 MetalPiranhamon (MetalPiranimon)
• No.564 Deaxmon (Death-X-mon)
• No.567 Grandymon (Gladimon)
• No.569 Mermeidmon (Mermaimon)

Source

• Drimon (Dorimon)
• Dolmon (DORUmon)
• Dolgamon (DORUgamon)
• Dolgreymon (DORUguremon)
• Dolgoramon (DORUgoramon)
• Deaxdolgamon (Death-X-DORUgamon)
• Deaxdolgremon (Death-X-DORUguremon)
• Deaxdolgoramon (Death-X-DORUgoramon)
• Sildragomon (Ginryumon)
• Flydragomon (Hisyaryumon
• Goldragomon (Ouryumon)
• Alphamon Goldensword (Alphamon: Ouryuken)
• Axcabaliermon (Medieval Dukemon)
• Pulolomon (Puroromon)
• Volantcatmon (Tobucatmon)
• Microtyramon (Mametyramon)
• UtimateBrachiomon (Ultimate Brachimon)
• Omechamon (Omekamon)

Source

--Shadow Shinji (talk) 10:53, 7 February 2017 (CST)

About your malicious modification skills description and reupload all my pictures without inform

What is your relationship with TMS ? You two are the same person or what? First of all, modify my skill description without reasons and basis official source，seond reupload all my pictures of miscellaneous without any notification. What is your attitude toward people?

Sorry for the delay in my reply, I really didn't mean to offend you with any of my actions, and forgive me in advance cause I didn't had enough time till now to explain you the reasons behind each of my changes.

Firstly, I re-uploaded the sketches in order to provide them a proper title, cause they had random titles like "37565724959393.png", but I pointed out that you are the original uploader, following the rules of the community, as you can check at the bottom of each one.

Secondly, no TMS and I are not the same person, I simply reverted your edits cause he's been doing a great work with the Attack Descriptions of each page some months from now, and I thought it was convenient to check with him this changes with him before we proceed to include them properly. You have to keep in mind that there are many people who take information from this site, and we have to be cautious with this kind of things, especially when no source is provided. Hope you understand. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 10:29, 12 March 2017 (CDT)

Adveture designs

So, I see you've found scans of the Digimon Adventure 15th Anniversary Blu-ray Box concept art book. Can you point me to the source? And does it also have 02 15th scans? I really, REALLY, want pictures of those two booklets. Anime... PAWĀ!!! 09:36, 31 March 2017 (CDT)

I would love to tell you, but unfortunately this scans were originally uploaded by an user called Tamiacoco, which is banned as for now, because he/she broke some rules of the community (I think). I just uploaded them again because Tamiacoco assigned incorrect random names to this files. Maybe you can ask him/her as soon as it is active again. Sorry. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 09:51, 31 March 2017 (CDT)

Translations

How far along are you on translating the other Legendary Warriors' profiles? Chimera-gui (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2017 (CDT)

I've found them in this thread from WtW, so I'll add a few more :) --Shadow Shinji (talk) 12:19, 11 April 2017 (CDT)

Olympus 12

Por qué agregaste Next Order como juego donde aparecen los Olympus? --Convergencia Digital (talk) 18:46, 30 July 2017 (CDT)

En una de las misiones aparecen Dianamon y Minervamon como integrantes de los Olympus. Puedes verlo aquí :).

Por cierto, ¿en qué momento se menciona el grupo o alguno de sus integrantes en Digimon Twin y en Accel Nature Genome? No tenía ni idea...--Shadow Shinji (talk) 19:36, 30 July 2017 (CDT)

En el Twin aparece Minervamon con el mismo perfil del Reference Book donde dice que es una integrante del grupo, lo mismo pasa en el Accel con Mercurymon y Neptunemon. Gracias por mostrarme donde salen, nunca jugué next order, así que cosas así se me escapan xD--Convergencia Digital (talk) 23:38, 30 July 2017 (CDT)

Crack Team

Concerning your latest update to the Crack Team page... I fail to see any direct mentions of Crack Team in the profiles referenced on the Related Digimon section. Is there any proof that the profiles are indeed talking about Crack Team? ShikaSS (talk) 10:43, 12 August 2017 (CDT)

And yes, I have read Convergencia's discussion page about it. It certainly makes sense at first sight, but it certainly is making a lot of assumptions. ShikaSS (talk) 10:55, 12 August 2017 (CDT)

The think is that Convergencia Digital told me that there are quite evidences of this in the booklets of the Ultimate Battle Deck 3, which I'm still waiting to see, apart from the profiles from the Digital Monsters V-Pet line. Apart from that, if you think it twice it's pretty obvious, while not being the group mentioned as such (you know that in Digimon, they love to play with this kind of ambiguous, apart from the fact that the Crack Team is first mentioned quite later than the debut of most of this Digimon; so it would be ultimately kind of a retcon). Worth remind that the official profiles in the DRB and so on, talk about the Core World in Digimon, where the Crack Team, same as the other groups exists; according to this booklets, the Crack Team is responsible of creating the Digimon belonging to the Metal Empire, that is, Mugendramon;

Mugendramon: "It was built by synthesizing the parts of many Cyborg Digimon, and it is thought that all of the Cyborg Digimon produced so far were merely prototypes for the completion of Mugendramon."

So now we know that the Crack Team constructed Mugendramon, and the prototype Digimon that were needed in order to complete its form; that is:

• Andromon's shoulder pads: "Andromon was developed as a prototype for Cyborg Digimon, and the mechanically-based Andromon and organically-based cyborg Boltmon were manufactured at the same time. This technology was appropriated for Metal Greymon and Megadramon. As a prototype Digimon it possesses neither will nor emotion, and it is faithful to its programmed behavior." It is clear that both Boltmon and Hi Andromon were also manufactured by the same team:
  • Boltmon: "A prototype Cyborg Digimon constructed at the same time as Andromon. Unlike the mechanically-based Andromon, the organically-based Boltmon possessed emotions, as well as power that surpassed Andromon's, but it was difficult to control and ran wild, and was consigned to oblivion in the darkness."
  • Hi Andromon: "An Ultimate Cyborg Digimon that was perfected by improving the incomplete Andromon. The percentage of Chrome Digizoid parts which compose its body has increased, and it is impossible to miss the extent of its gains in offensive and defensive power from this, compared to Andromon."
• Megadramon's helmet and right claw: "As a Digimon that was artificially remodeled by someone, it was programmed to destroy everything. It can definitely be said that its existence is the epitome of a computer virus. It can easily penetrate Computer Networks protected by strong security, and can very easily destroy and then completely reformat the host computer." In this sense, the profile of Gigadramon states:
  • Gigadramon: "A dark dragon Digimon developed at the same time as Megadramon."
• Metal Tyrannomon's jaw and chest circuits: "A Cyborg Digimon that remodeled its body in order to acquire mightier powers. After Megadramon was remodeled for anti-air use, Metal Tyranomon was remodeled as an anti-ground interceptor Digimon."
• Metal Mamemon's Psycho Blasters.
• Metal Greymon (Virus)'s left claw.

This is pretty conclusive in my opinion; Anyways, I'm not really sure how to handle this information, but at least I think this connections should be noted somehow in the Crack Team page. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 07:23, 13 August 2017 (CDT)

Like I said, I read what Convergencia posted and agree with it from a logical standpoint, but I take issue with treating what are assumptions (eg. just because Andromon was created by the Crack Team, it doesn't mean they were the ones to perfect him into HiAndromon) - albeit based - as facts, a problem I already had when watching Convergencia's video. Again, I do agree it makes sense but I wouldn't include it on a site like this which is meant to only have absolute factual information. At least not without a proper explanation, you know? This fandom is already full of misconceptions. ShikaSS (talk) 17:10, 13 August 2017 (CDT)

No se resolvería esto con poner una pestaña aparte de "digimon relacionados al crack team"? que sea una lista en la que salga nombre del digimon y a un lado cómo esta relacionado con el grupo, y en casos como el de HiAndromon, el cual siento que es el único de la lista que incluí que uno podría debatir que no tiene relacion alguna con el crack team, simplemente se especifica justamente eso, que no hay claridad de si fue el crack team quien lo mejoro o no, en todos los demas las relaciones son demasiado obvias como para simplemente ignorarlas y sacarlas de la página. --Convergencia Digital (talk) 23:41, 14 August 2017 (CDT)

Lo que quiero no es borrarlas de la página, tan sólo pensaba que sería mejor apuntar que las relaciones no estan confirmadas oficialmente. Lo que Shadow Shinji escribió es suficiente para mi ShikaSS (talk) 10:10, 15 August 2017 (CDT)

Aegiomon Chronicle's Titles

I've been translating the cutscenes to portuguese for a while through the same blog sourced in the page, and it should be noted that every chapter name that's in english is made up by the author, including the title "Aegiomon's Chronicle". The author points this out here "では、デジモンクルセイダー外伝「Aegiomon's Chronicle」（私が勝手に名づけた）、どうぞお楽しみください。" - ShikaSS (talk) 20:16, 12 September 2017 (CDT)

Oh really? Heck my fault. Is there any official name for the storyline then?

I recall them simply being quests, so I don't think there was an actual name for the storyline, but I can't be sure. ShikaSS (talk) 08:49, 13 September 2017 (CDT)

Evolution

Why did you comment out the evolutions from Digimon Masters and All-Star Rumble? Luph (talk) 18:47, 19 September 2017 (CDT)

Because they are non-canon from a Japanese perspective. DMO comes from South Korea, and All-Star Rumble was only launched in Europe and the Americas. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:54, 19 September 2017 (CDT)

Then it should have been given some kind of warning or sign to indicate it. Commenting them out basically makes people unable to see them which effectively not give any kind of acknowledgment.

These games are still official Digimon games regardless of the country of origin. They are not any "less Digimon" just because it was not released in Japan.

And I fail to see why it's "non-canon from Japanese perspective" is an issue. If that's the case, I don't see the purpose of having pages about DMO and All-Star Rumble here on this wiki, as well as manhua like D-Cyber. They are also "non-canon" from Japanese perspective. Luph (talk) 19:31, 19 September 2017 (CDT)

You kind of misunderstood me. When I'm saying that they are non-canon, I'm not saying they are less Digimon than any other one game. That's why it's pretty natural they have their own pages, info and stuff. While there are some evolutionary routes that make sense, most of them doesn't at all. And that's because Bandai Japan, which is the main company in charge of creating and further developing Digimon, is not invoved at all in this products, so their creators doesn't seem to be concerned about fitting a canon. I'm going to put you an example so you can see whan I'm talking about:

Sakuyamon (Regular Mega) -> Kuzuhamon (Burst Mode).

• Kuzuhamon's official profile in the DRB: "It is said that only those among them of a high level are able to evolve to Sakuyamon, and they normally just evolve to Kuzuhamon."
• Burst Evolution: "Enables a Mega Digimon to reach its Burst Mode, an even more-powerful form."

The case of Digimon D-Cyber is slightly different. It's a Bandai Asia exclusive product, but unlike most of the products of Digimon originally made overseas, it's an stand-alone continuity with ots own canon, rules, lore, and universe-building, so it deserves this kind of special treatment. Same case as "Fight! Digital Monsters" manhua. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2017 (CDT)

Digimon does not really have a canon so to speak because multiverse exist and each series is canon within its continuity.

Also, whether an evolution makes sense or not is pretty much a subjective sentiment and a wiki should only put objective facts. There have been many instances where evolution doesn't really match the profile or completely ignore them. For example, Omegamon's profile stated that it's a fusion of WarGreymon and MetalGarurumon, but in other media it can be evolved from a Dynasmon. Or Omegamon Alter-B which can be formed by Titamon and MetalEtemon. There are many other examples of this and they all came from Bandai Japan. Also, it seems like an arbitrary standard to decide which series should get special treatment and which one should not.

It's also a big assumption to say that Bandai Japan as the owner of the series doesn't know or care about what's going on in non-Japanese media. There have been examples in the series where it shows they know and give proper acknowledgments, with the latest and most obvious one is tri having Digimon's English dub names on the Digivice (whereas Asian countries where most Digimon media were released in general use Japanese names).

To give examples, just because McDonald in India doesn't serve beef, it doesn't mean the owner of McDonald in US doesn't know or care about what's going on in India. They know and let the Indian McDonalds have their own version of burgers. It also doesn't make Indian McDonald is less McDonald than the one in the US. Another example is like regionally distributed Pokemon like a Pokemon with special moveset is only distributed in Europe and not elsewhere and this doesn't mean this Pokemon is not canon. It's still a canon information and deserves to be listed and acknowledged.

So, I think these evolutions should be listed with proper indications, like for example in Cyber Sleuth page where Beelzebumon Blast Mode and Cherubimon Vice are listed on the obtainable Digimon, but these are only "canon" to non-Japanese as they are unobtainable in Japanese version. Luph (talk) 20:54, 19 September 2017 (CDT)

I was asked to look at this, presumably because I'm an admin. In my opinion, we should make some note even of evolutions from non-Japanese products (and I believe All-Star Rumble was made by a Japanese studio, which muddies the issue). As long as they are sourced, people can make their own call on whether they want to consider them "canon." It's similar to how we note the dub names of Digimon attacks even when they're nonsensical (and one of these days, God willing, I'm going to source all of those too). Now, whether there needs to be any kind of "warning" about potentially non-canon evolutions, similar to how we put dub attack names in a separate column, I'm not sure. I don't really feel comfortable making that call myself, being rather new as a Wikimon admin. TMS (talk) 17:16, 20 September 2017 (EST)

It's a bit excessively nit-picky not to include information from games that aren't Japanese because they are not "canon" enough. Digimon as a franchise is a massive 20-year clusterfuck with a ton of hands in the pot so to speak. Even the source material can't keep things remotely consistent. As long as all revolutions are properly referenced and sourced, it should not be a big deal.--devkyu (talk) 22:30, 21 September 2017 (CDT)

Okay guys, thanks for your feedback. Anyways, even if we decide to include this kind of incanonical evolutions, how are we supposed to handle them? For example, how does the Super Forms of All-Star Rumble exactly work? Do we want to claim, for example, that Ageisdramon warps evolves from Gomamon, or it is more like a direct evolution from Plesiomon (as his official profile states)? I would say the latter, but I would like to hear your thoughts on this issue too. This would imply that:

• Agumon >> War Greymon > Omegamon OR Agumon >> War Greymon & Agumon >> Omegamon
• Piyomon >> Hououmon > Examon OR Piyomon >> Hououmon & Piyomon >> Examon
• Dorulumon > Shoutmon X4 OR Dorulumon > Shoutmon X4 & Dorulumon > Shoutmon X5B
• Gabumon >> Metal Garurumon > Omegamon OR Gabumon >> Metal Garurumon & Gabumon >> Omegamon
• Tailmon > Angewomon > Examon OR Tailmon > Angewomon & Tailmon >> Examon
• Gomamon >> Plesiomon > Ageisdramon OR Gomamon >> Plesiomon & Gomamon >> Ageisdramon
• Guilmon >> Megalo Growmon > Dukemon OR Guilmon >> Megalo Growmon & Guilmon >> Dukemon
• Impmon >> Beelzebumon > Shoutmon X5B OR Impmon >> Beelzebumon & Impmon > Shoutmon X5B
• Shoutmon > Omega Shoutmon > Shoutmon DX OR Shoutmon > Omega Shoutmon & Shoutmon > Shoutmon DX
• Tentomon >> Atlur Kabuterimon > Tyrant Kabuterimon OR Tentomon >> Atlur Kabuterimon & Tentomon >> Tyrant Kabuterimon
• V-mon > XV-mon >> Imperialdramon: Fighter Mode OR V-mon > XV-mon & V-mon >> Imperialdramon: Fighter Mode
• Wormmon > Stingmon >> Imperialdramon: Fighter Mode OR Wormmon > Stingmon & Wormmon >> Imperialdramon: Fighter Mode

--Shadow Shinji (talk) 10:06, 22 September 2017 (CDT)

It's been a while since I played the game, but I don't recall there being any reference to the second evolution options being evolved forms of the first evolution options. If there is, that's fine, but just going by what we actually see happening we see things like Gomamon directly Warp Evolving to Aegisdramon. So that's what I myself would go with. TMS (talk) 13:37, 22 September 2017 (EST)

I agree with TMS here, for what it's worth.KrytenKoro06 (talk) 13:47, 13 October 2017 (CDT)

Chaos Dukemon Chaos Mode

Hola de nuevo :3 (revisa twitter), por que agregaste esa pagina para chaos dukemon? esa figura no que no es canon? era una figura estado unidense, minimo yo diria que habria que especificar su procedensia en la pagina para no confundir a la gente--Convergencia Digital (talk) 15:48, 8 October 2017 (CDT)

Así es, pero al tratarse de un Digimon "inédito", podría ser importante que cuente con su propia página en la wiki. Por ello, agregué la etiqueta de "Unreleased Digimon", porque no es un Digimon canon en Japón, al menos por el momento, pero no existe ninguna contraparte original tampoco. Si los editores consideran que no tiene que tener su propia página, se verá supongo. Aún así, trataré de incluir una nota aclaratoria (Malditas notificaciones de Twitter que no aivsan) -.- --Shadow Shinji (talk) 19:29, 8 October 2017 (CDT)

Gaiamon

Hola, no se como arreglar esto, pero en la pagina de Gaiamon (digimon) pusieron el chip de Gaiamon appmon https://wikimon.net/Gaiamon

Armamon

Hola amigo, oye quisiera cambiar de una vez por todas la pagina de Armamon. En la imagen que tienen puesta de Armamon no es realmente el Armamon neutro, es Armamon que absorbio a Barbamon y lo usa de espada, el Armamon normal no tiene espada, y yo tengo una imagen del juego de él sin espada para ponerla si es necesario.--Convergencia Digital (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2017 (CST)

¡Disculpa la respuesta tardía! No sé por qué motivo, no se me notificó tu mensaje y lo acabo de ver ahora revisando mi página de discusión. Pues la verdad no tenía ni idea de eso, por descontado sube la imagen y añádela en la página. Podríamos especificar este pequeño detalle de algún modo (algo tipo Armamon (antes) y Armamon (después)) xD Pero en serio, si ese es el caso, entonces ¿de dónde surge OmegaArmamon Burst Mode? --Shadow Shinji (talk) 16:51, 23 November 2017 (CST)

En el juego Barbamon quiere usar a Armamon como su arma para conquistar la LStou zone (o todas las zonas, no recuerdo), pero cuando llega con Armamon su poder era demasiado como para contenerlo, y termina siendo Barbamon el que se convierte en el arma de Armamon. Xros Heart pelea contra Armamon con su Barbamon-espada y lo derrota, liberando a Barbamon en el proceso,quien aprovecha que dejaron totalmente debilitado a Armamon para absorberlo, y asi evoluciona a OmegaArmamon BM.--Convergencia Digital (talk) 07:59, 24 November 2017 (CST)

¡Suena interesante! Conocía un poco sobre la historia, pero no todos los detalles. Estoy deseando ver la imagen de Armamon al natural. Por cierto, esto creo que sucede a mitad del juego más o menos, ¿tú sabes si Barbamon efectivamente evoluciona (o hace Death Evolution) de un ZeedMillenniummon que es una especie de virus digital, o ZeedMillenniummon Y Barbamon son seres distintos? --Shadow Shinji (talk) 09:19, 24 November 2017 (CST)

No, Barbamon y Zeed son seres diferentes en el juego. Durante una quest principal Xros Heart pelea contra zeed en un salon, y luego de que lo derrotas aparece Barbamon por atrás diciendo que Zeed era solo basura espacial (no recuerdo las palabras exactas, como sabras el juego solo esta en japo xD) y luego lo absorbe. Aquí te dejo imagenes del Armamon natural sin espada, y de la escena de Zeed por si te sirve :3 (por cierto, la pelea contra Armamon y Barbamon ocurre al final del juego)--Convergencia Digital (talk) 10:00, 24 November 2017 (CST)

• 
• 
• 
• 

Genial! Estoy retocando todas las páginas para incluir la información corregida :) Muchas gracias compañero! --Shadow Shinji (talk) 10:46, 24 November 2017 (CST)

Hacker's Memory manga

Hey, did you read the manga somewhere? I can't find it no matter where I look. Anime... PAWĀ!!! 20:57, November 29, 2017 (UTC)

Yup, I found a Chinese-translated version in this Facebook fanpage. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 16:14, 29 November 2017 (CST)

Minotaurmon

Unlike Whamon where Adult and Perfect have been used interchangeably, Minotaurmon hasn't been explicitly treated as a Perfect since 1997 making Perfect an obsolete Level for the species just as it is for many other pre-Adventure species that were originally listed as Perfect. Chimera-gui (talk) 07:45, 23 January 2018 (CST)

Jogress and Fusion

I know you said treating both methods as Jogress on the evolution sections was only for organizational purposes, but won't that be misleading for people who are not aware of the difference between Fusion and Jogress? If what worries you is organization, then my suggestion would be not to use "Jogress" or "Fusion" at all. Instead, we could simply use, for example, on Ordinemon's case, "Ordinemon (with Raguelmon)". ShikaSS (talk) 09:27, 23 February 2018 (CST)

Agree. It's misleading and contradicts what official sources said. If you were fine to ignore official sources in the name of "organizational purpose", then you may as well remove DigiXros as well since it's just another instance of Digimon fusion and replace everything by "(with <insert name of Digimon>)" like Shika408 said. Here is one example. Also, I noticed you also treated mutation as the same as evolution (even though it was stated to be not the case), so I don't see the point of keeping "Dark Evolution" either since it's just another instance of Digimon evolution. Luph (talk) 06:56, 24 February 2018 (CST)

As for Jogress/Fusion regards, I honestly don't see that much of a difference. Because yeah, the DigiXros/Xros Up is a totally different thing, but what's the core difference between a Jogress and a Fusion (Super Xros Wars aside)? For instance, Omegamon has been treated both as a Jogress (02) and a Fusion (Cyber Sleuth), and If I'm not wrong, it's essentially the same. As for the Mutation/Evolution, yeah in tri. they blatantly state that it's not the same process, but what's exactly the main diffence here too? In my opinion, I think it's just a matter of emphasize Meicoomon's uniqueness, because of being the main character, but biologically-wise, a mutation and an evolution refers to the same process. At least that's what I think. So I'd suggest to just treat the Jogress/Fusion and DigiXros/Xros Up as a separate thing, with the w/ option for the cases which may be confusing to some extent, and mutation as a subtype paragraph of the Evolution process (has this even been differenciated before tri. came out?). --Shadow Shinji (talk) 07:16, 27 February 2018 (CST)

It seems to me that it wouldn't be too difficult to simply note in the text whether something is a Jogress, Fusion, DigiXros, mutation, or whatever. If that gets too cluttered, I think ShikaSS's suggestion is fine. It might be best to do that, actually, since the same combination has sometimes been treated as more than one thing. --TMS (talk) 17:43, 27 February 2018 (EST)

Actually, Omegamon was referred as Fusion (Gattai) even in 02, and again in Xros Wars Hunters. We can also include Digimon cards. Omegamon was treated as Jogress in V-Tamer (iirc) and in games, which could just be because they didn't really bother to code separate cases for Jogress and Fusion in the game, but for plot-related fusion (e.g. Nokia's Omegamon) is still referred as Fusion. The commonly agreed difference between Fusion and Jogress is that Fusion doesn't advance the level of the component Digimon, while Jogress does (e.g. Omegamon is an Ultimate just like WarGreymon and MetalGarurumon, while Paildramon is a Perfect when XV-mon and Stingmon are Adult level). In case of Omegamon, it can get murky whether Super Ultimate level is recognized as separate level in a particular universe or not (e.g. Adventure doesn't acknowledge it with both Omegamon and Ordinemon are still listed as Ultimate, while V-Tamer seemed to treat Super Ultimate as its own level, hence Omegamon is a Jogress instead). Ordinemon also is implied to be not an evolution (judging from Koshiro's comment in the latest tri trailer), which seems to further suggest the "non-changing level" trait. Meanwhile, in Super Xros Wars game, Omegamon is a result of DigiXros between WarGreymon and MetalGarurumon.

In the end, I'd just follow what they said it to be as it is not really our concern to deal with the meta-canon. The choice is either listing them as what they said in their respective canon (Jogress, Fusion, DigiXros), or treat all instances of Digimon fusing together as the same by substituting the terms with "(with <insert Digimon name here>)". Same with evolution, be it normal evolution, mutation, dark evolution, etc. I don't think Megidramon in Tamers and ShinGreymon RM in Savers were ever explicitly mentioned as "Dark Evolution" anyway as the term only came out in Adventure series (cmiiw); those were just Evolution in the broader canon sense Luph (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2018 (CST)

The problem is that even if it's commonly agreed, that is still only a fan interpretation and not actually stated by any official lore where the two mechanics may as well be one and the same. For example, MetalGreymon from Xros Wars is a Xros yet could easily be treated as the Jogress of Greymon and MailBirdramon making it equivalent to Paildramon whom itself was a Xros in XW as well. Millenniumon was likewise treated as a Xros in the Xros Wars manga. Chimera-gui (talk) 19:53, 27 February 2018 (CST)

And that's why I said, it is NOT our concern about the "why", but with the "what". It does not change the fact that the official sources used these terminologies - fusion, Jogress, DigiXros, mutation, etc. Those could be different processes altogether, or the same process with different names; it does NOT matter. Wiki should only list information as is (how they were represented in their respective medium). It's either you follow the canon sources, or you just treated them all the same WITHOUT using unrelated, official terminology as that would count as misrepresentation (because you interpreted these processes as "the same", where they could also be different processes). If they said Paildramon and Milleniummon in XW was a DigiXros, then list them as DigiXros; problem solved. Why would you feel the need to force them into one term - "Jogress" when the offical sources didn't say so? Luph (talk) 07:49, 28 February 2018 (CST)

Strictly speaking, I was only elaborating on TMS' earlier point about the terminology being used interchangeably depending on the media and the issue of the fan interpretation because of this. Chimera-gui (talk) 10:32, 28 February 2018 (CST)

Jogress, a word that came about by combining joint and progress, is a method of evolution that was first introduced in the original Digimon Pendulum 20 years ago.

Jogress is done by combining specific Digimon together, resulting in an evolution into a new Digimon. They also point out that while fusion is similiar to jogress, it doesn't change the Digimon's level (they then point out that sometimes, including in the new Pendulums, jogress is used as a catchall term for both jogress and fusion.)

Source. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 17:42, 2 March 2018 (CST)

I'm glad they have been acknowledging the difference more and more. Kenji Watanabe had already stated the difference to a fan via twitter. Anyway, I see no point in further discussing this matter. ShikaSS (talk) 08:33, 3 March 2018 (CST)

I still personally consider Jogress, Fusion, and Xros as interchangeable term for what is fundamentally the same mechanic since apart from the level increase, they are functionally the same and just about any Digimon that falls under one could potentionally fall under the other two and in multiple cases already have (again, any Jogress/Fusion in Xros Wars media with DarkKnightmon in the pendulum presumably doing the reverse.) Chimera-gui (talk) 13:13, 3 March 2018 (CST)

Ogudomon

Hola amigo :3 oye vi que subiste unas imagenes de los modelos 3d de las espadas de ogudomon en el battle terminal y otra imagen que creo que era del modelo 3d de ogudomon, aunque esa imagen ya no la encuentro. De donde sacaste esas imagenes???--Convergencia Digital (talk) 21:03, 31 March 2018 (CDT)

Hola :D Esas imágenes las renderizó un fan chino en base al modelo del BT02, como se puede apreciar al detalle en este vídeo; las puedes encontrar en Twitter: el Modelo en 3D y el detalle de las espadas y las coronas de los Siete Pecados Capitales. El caso fue que al principio creí que este mismo usuario las había extraído del juego arcade de algún modo, por eso las subí a la wiki, pero luego aclaró que en realidad era una recontrucción fidedigna "no oficial" que él mismo había hecho en base al modelo oficial; por ende, sí sirven como referencia puesto que son una reproducción del original, aunque infringían las normas de la comunidad al ser imágenes "fanmade" y él mismo las eliminó. Espero haberte ayudado compañero :) --Shadow Shinji (talk) 06:59, 1 April 2018 (CDT)

Frontier line art

Shadow, where did you get that line art? Anime... PAWĀ!!! 12:52, April 1, 2018 (UTC)

They come from the Digimon Series Memorial Book, which you can download here in case you are interested. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 05:35, 3 April 2018 (CDT)

Re: Frontier Dub names

Sure. I forgot to do it while I was editing, but all of those edits to the dub names of techniques and names comes from the european portuguese dub (PROBABLY by extension the european spanish dub aswell, though I have not checked). Weirdly enough, as for technique names, they keep changing them around which might be a bit confusing, for example Aldamon switches to Solar Wind Destroyer during the final arc when it wasn't called that before, same for Agunimon's Burning Salamander and a couple others. One thing I forgot to edit is the characters' ages, though. They appear to be exactly 1 year younger than usual (because of how school works I guess? I have no idea). Anyway, if you want me to post audio-visual evidence I'm sure I can upload clips so you can see for yourself. Thanks! -- Dass077 (talk) 14:59, 18 April 2018 (CDT)

I think that should be enough :) Thanks a lot for your reply! --Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:12, 22 April 2018 (CDT)

Bolded Evolutions

What are your reasons for bolding evolutions like Wizarmon to DeathMeramon and DeathMeramon to Beelzebumon? --TMS (talk) 20:13, 27 October 2018 (EDT)

They've just appeared in Digimon ReArise. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 19:18, 27 October 2018 (CDT)

CresGarurumon

Source for Masters? I mean he's probably gonna get in since BlitzGreymon is in... but you seem to be assuming.Muur (talk) 02:13, 2 January 2019 (CST)

DMO officially announced that both CresGarurumon and Alter-S were also confirmed for the game. I cannot find the post atm but anyways maybe it's better to wait to their official release date. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 10:41, 3 January 2019 (CST)

It would be better for that yes. For example, they once announced a line of Chuumon - Sukamon - Garbagemon and then cancelled that line before adding it. The fact they've pulled the post saying theyre adding these two Mons is sus, and they might not end up in there after all.Muur (talk) 23:54, 3 January 2019 (CST)

Encounters protag art

Where'd you get it? I got pics as well from screenshotting a video, but yours are way more HQ.Muur (talk) 03:13, 14 January 2019 (CST)

They come from Dimensão Digimon. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:50, 14 January 2019 (CST)

The ones of the tamers themselves arent there.Muur (talk) 19:19, 14 January 2019 (CST)

Sorry I put the incorrect link. Here's the correct one.--Shadow Shinji (talk) 06:04, 15 January 2019 (CST)

DarkKnightmon (Gulfmon)

Tienes idea de donde salio que esta xros de darkknightmon es con gulfmon? porque en el manga no se aclara en ningun momento

Yo también me lo he planteado varias veces. Sinceramente no lo sé, he estado viendo los omakes del tercer tomo y creo que no menciona nada al respecto. No sé si otro de los omakes podría indicar alguna cosa, si entiendes japonés puedo pasarte alguna foto. Lo único que se me ocurre es que sea una suposición dado que los cuernos que muestra esa forma son idénticos a los de Gulfmon (y bueno al parecer sólo se nutre de Digimon oscuros). --Shadow Shinji (talk) 14:24, 17 January 2019 (CST)

Hmm dejame echarles un vistazo--Convergencia Digital (talk) 14:25, 17 January 2019 (CST)

susanoomon

Whoops forgot to put that one. Good spot.Muur (talk) 12:10, 5 February 2019 (CST)

My pleasure. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 19:03, 5 February 2019 (CST)

Reason I changed it is, I found JP footage of someone making a imperialdramon figther mode. it shows them as ultimate in yellow. rearise uses SU though, so itll be interesting to see who gets to become SU. (I've been on the RA discord and learned a lot about the story and characters)Muur (talk) 19:32, 5 February 2019 (CST)

Página de God

Estuve mejorando la página de God y ya esta lista, pero al final de la página me sale un texto rojo de error que no se cómo corregir y tampoco se ve la nota que puse al lado del nombre de Bagramon. Tu sabes como reparar eso? Te agradezco de antemano la ayuda :3--Convergencia Digital (talk) 18:27, 28 February 2019 (CST)

Wow acabo de revisar el historial de cambios y es increíble la cantidad de información interesante que has añadido a la página!! Ya he soluciona el problema (aunque las referencias son tantas y tan largas que desplazan la sección de Notas para la derecha). Muchas gracias ^^.

Por cierto, ¿tienes también esa cantidad de información sobre la Dark Area? Es una página clave en esta wiki que por desgracia está un tanto desactualizada...--Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:40, 28 February 2019 (CST)

Gracias :3 si, la tengo, pero no creo que la ponga muy pronto, es demasiada y ya con lo de hoy me agote(? ajajajaja--Convergencia Digital (talk) 19:30, 28 February 2019 (CST)

Jajajaja se entiende!! Gracias igualmente! Qué curiosidad por conocer esa información, Saludos. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 08:48, 1 March 2019 (CST)

Imágenes

Cómo puedo subir imágenes a la wiki sin que se vea tan feo? Quiero subir las imágenes que tengo del digizoid maldito a la página del chrome digizoid junto a las imagenes del chrome, gold y chrome alloy que hay al final, pero no se cómo.--Convergencia Digital (talk) 17:54, 20 March 2019 (CDT)

Perdona creo que no te entiendo. ¿A qué te refieres con que se vea feo? El problema es de la calidad de la imagen? Por entenderlo mejor. Subir imágenes es muy sencillo, sólo tienes que pinchar el botón de "Upload File" en la caja de "Tools" al final de la columna izquierda. Si tienes cualquier duda estaré encantado de ayudarte. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:39, 20 March 2019 (CDT)

Early names

Digimon's early names should just be part of trivia. Those names are not their "other names" because they are not the final names (i.e. they were rejected). Calling these names their "other names" would be misleading. Luph (talk)

I agree. In many cases the names weren't even being applied to the final design of the Digimon in question. --TMS ([[User talk:TMS|talk])) 19:48, March 24, 2019 (EST)

I don't see why they cannot be in the main infobox too but I believe we can all give our personal opinion and make a decision. If that's the case, there are plenty other case apart from Frontier's: GaruruGreymon, SasoriBellamon and Vademon Kai are some example I can think of now. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2019 (CDT)

I think that to be consistent we shouldn't count the other rejected names as alternate names either. They should still be acknowledged on the page, though, in a trivia section or whatever. --TMS (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2019 (EST)

Evolutions

why remove those? They're sourced evolutions that are able to be done and therefore should be documented. In those instances they evolve into higher level versions of themselves like with Whamon. Locomon and Parasimon also become themselves in the card game and have been listed here for half a decade. Muur (talk) 07:22, 6 April 2019 (CDT)

Well to be honest I'm not sure if that evolution paths adds too much relevant info into the Evo box, like something you cannot skip. I mean, for starters DMO is not a Japanese game, which doesn't mean that it should be sourced either way, but in the case of this evo lines, it looks more random than anything else, so I'm not sure if this implies anything worthy lore-wise. In the cases you have mentioned, Whamon is known for having two levels and both Locomon & Parasimon comes from both Toei cards for the OVA of Digimon Tamers, so it may imply something continuity-wise (who knows what). Anyways, maybe another opinion on this issue could be great. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 13:17, 6 April 2019 (CDT)

I mean, RPG, Soul Chaser, and Masters are still Bandai games. evolutions are evolutions. Who are you to decide if something is worthy "lore wise" lol? I mean, I have read before where you wanted to remove All-Star Rumble evolutions and were told they were fine to include because bandai is bandai. https://wikimon.net/User_talk:Shadow_Shinji#EvolutionMuur (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2019 (CDT)

While I think that having a Digimon "evolve" to itself is rather silly, whatever we do about it should be consistent. Either we remove all such pseudo-evolutions, or cite all of them. --TMS (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2019 (EST)

Here's a list off the top of my head:

• Shoutmon/Ballistamon/Toyagumon/dorulumon/the four sovereigns/tanemon: masters
• daemon: masters, rpg AND soul chaser (And arguably some other media based on the fact its cloaked turning into "beast mode")
• omnimon/alphamon: soul chaser
• locomon and parasimon: card game
• magnagarurumon: hackers memory

So yeah, you left a few out when you removed them in the first place.Muur (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2019 (CDT)

My point is that in a Japanese-oriented wikia like Wikimon, I don't see how this info could be useful somehow for anyone. In fact, if we accept this kind of pseudo-evolutions, the next step would be including all them with the four main evo levels listed. Having Qinglongmon listed as Child, Adult, Perfect and Ultimate at the same time, wouldn't be misleading to someone who may check Wikimon to get useful information? I'm not saying we are above Bandai decisions and all that, but in my opinion there is some confusing info we should skip for the sake of consistency. By the way, MagnaGarurumon's case is a Mode Change in fact. We should discuss if MG Detached should be considered a different species instead a la Miko Mode. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 16:51, 6 April 2019 (CDT)

For what it's worth, the wikia treats Levels that aren't from the DRB (when a profile is available) as secondary and I'm not fond of including instances a Digimon Digivolving into itself unless said Digivolution is actually acknowledged in the DRB which only Whamon's profile does, the rest seem more like they were done as a gameplay conceit.
This is also why I'm against treating the Perfect level Minotaurmon as its own species since unlike Whamon, the DRB profile makes no mention of the Perfect level version's existence at all and the separation is based solely on a card that, let's be honest here, has arguably less validity to canon than any non-Japanese game. Chimera-gui (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2019 (CDT)

The Digimon Soverings just have Champion and Mega forms. Shoutmon, Ballistamon, Dorulumon, and Tanemon are the ones with four, whilst Soul Chaser doesn't seem to list levels, and has four Omnimon/Alphamon (And Crimson Mode is seems, when I played the game to get the evolutions, their social media stated crimson mode is coming and that'd itd be the same as alphamon and omnimon). also, you were told higher up like I said, non japanese media counts. so you can stop stating about "relevancey to a Japanese wiki" or whatever. at this point it sounds more like you dont want them listed because theyre from a korean game... especially when you seem fine with parasimon and locomon.Muur (talk) 17:29, 6 April 2019 (CDT)

My preference is to remove from the evolution lists all instances of Digimon evolving to themselves or having weird level shenanigans in Masters. They can be mentioned in the relevant sections. The only issue is the card evolutions, which don't really have a section so much as a separate page for those cards. I do think, though, that it would be best to get rid of all such non-evolutions. They're interesting trivia, but I don't think it's worth having them in the evolution lists. --TMS (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2019 (EST)

Mercurymon en Savers

¿Tienes idea de donde salió que el Mercurymon de Savers es parte de los Olympus? Porque en la página de los Olympus ponen como que es uno de ellos pero no tiene fuente, y no lo dicen en el anime, así que no se de donde lo sacaron.--Convergencia Digital (talk) 00:44, 16 April 2019 (CDT)

Happened to see this, so I figured I'd go ahead and answer. Yukidarumon mentions the Olympos XII in episode 24. --TMS (talk) 2:11, 16 April 2019 (EST)

Exacto, es justo como ha dicho TMS. En ese episodio, mencionan que el Mundo Digital de Savers está dominado por dominios gobernados por cada uno de los Olympos XII. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 04:35, 17 April 2019 (CDT)

Jupitermon Wrath Mode

Esto no es tanto una pregunta sobre lo que sale en su página en wikimon, pero no se si has notado que la cabeza de Jupitermon Wrath Mode pareciera ser un Jupitermon hecho bolita xD Puedes ver que los "cuernos" blancos que salen de su cabeza, son en realidad la capa de Jupitermon, se alcanzan a ver los martillos en miniatura a los costados de la cabeza, la armadura de su pecho e incluso el casco de jupitermon con las alas encima. El tema es que me gustaría corroborarlo de alguna manera, y quería saber si podrías preguntarle a Kenji o a alguien por Twitter al respecto, ya que suelen responderte más seguido que a mi (a mi nunca me han respondido nada xD). Dime que opinas

Wow no había visto este comentario por alguna razón. Es decir, sugieres que podría ser algo del estilo Ginkakumon Promote, o incluso Ceresmon Medium a la inversa? Esta información es muy interesante. Hasta donde sé, Wrath Mode se creó exclusivamente para Digimon Crusader, estamos seguros que Kenji intervino en el diseño? Ya me pasó antes cuando le pregunté acerca de la etimología de Bagramon y Dorbickmon...el pobre no tenía ni idea. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 15:20, 17 July 2019 (CDT)

Name

Where's that name from? for appmon phone. the app itself here doesnt seem to actually use that name. -> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=om.movegames.AppliMonsterss Muur (talk) 16:57, 8 July 2019 (CDT)

Mind posting the Twitter url here? It got cut off in the edit summary. And I assume the Korean names are from that game, right? Chimera-gui (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2019 (CDT)

The name comes from the game menu itself, you can see the appendix "Protect the World" (프로텍트 더 월드) above the regular Korean logo of Appli Monsters (어플몬스터). As for the Korean names, they actually come from the anime and chips sold in South Korea. Not sure if the game does include all the existing Appmon so far, but I can confirm it uses the Korean dub names so far (Searchmon, Punchmon, etc.). --Shadow Shinji (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2019 (CDT)

Ah okay, thanks. Interestingly Logamon lists "Logoutmon" as a name in parentheses before "Logamon" which based on the profile formatting means that Logoutmon is an alternate Japanese romanization. Chimera-gui (talk) 16:32, 17 July 2019 (CDT)

The App on the google play store still uses 어플몬스터 - 디펜스 though. The protect the world might just be some sort of tag line/catch phrase, like how digimon has "digimon digital monsters". I actually bookmarked that list of Korean names and planned to do it on the dub wiki at some point, but its not top of my priority list lol.Muur (talk) 20:11, 17 July 2019 (CDT)

omegaarmor

dunno why you changed it, it's an evolution of barbamon too. also, why is that note relevant? if it needs to be in there, shouldn't it be under the profile section, not the evolution?Muur (talk) 18:13, 25 July 2019 (CDT)

The thing is I'm not sure if it also applies to 'Forced DigiXros' which is what OmegaArmamon BM is. But I guess if we want to even Jogress/Fusion/DigiXros at the same level it could also be applied this cryteria. About the profile section, I think it's relevant because Barbamon being a Demon Lord explains why Armamon/OmegaArmamonBM is so massively destructuve and fights against the main characters side. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 11:48, 26 July 2019 (CDT)

I mean, Ordinemon and half of the shit in the Dark Generals arc was "forced xros" (well, fusion for ordinemon), besides, pages are supposed to only say "with" now to avoid situations where it would go "fusion or jogress or digixros with", etc, so "forced digixros" isn't really supposed to be there any more. "I think it's relevant because Barbamon being a Demon Lord explains why Armamon/OmegaArmamonBM is so massively destructive and fights against the main characters side." that is character info, that is not relevant to the evolution section, that's relevant to the game itself. if another omegamon armormon shows up, theres no gaurentee it's formed the same way. besides... what you just said is a headcanonMuur (talk) 16:21, 26 July 2019 (CDT)

I'm with Muur on this one. --TMS (talk) 23:39, 26 July 2019 (EST)

7 great demon lords

Me parece bien la explicación que añadiste a la pagina sobre ellos, pero hay un par de cosas que siento que quedaron mal explicadas. Los 7GDL se autodividieron a lo largo del multiverso como un método de protección, por lo que los great demon lords de cada mundo no son "avatares", sino que simplemente son fracciones del great demon lord original que dividió su existencia. Lo otro que deberías cambiar es el tema del "karma", porque en realidad no es algo que ocurra siempre ni una ley que deba cumplirse. En Cyber Sleuth el único motivo por el que Sayo recibe su "karma" es porque Mirei se enojó con ella por haber hecho a los GDL de su mundo más fuertes, y como tal es Mirei la que decide si es que castiga o no a las personas por matar a los GDL (en el mismo juego ella perdona a Takumi y no le hace nada, y en muchos otros juegos los protagonistas no reciben un castigo por matar a los GDL, es más bien un "cuando sea que a Mirei o a los administradores del digimundo quieran")--Convergencia Digital (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2019 (CDT)

Ya lo modifiqué ligeramente. Hazme saber qué te parece ahora o qué cambiarías. Con respecto al karma, Takumi/Ami no tienen que afrontarlo debido a que Mirei lo concentra todo en ese Monzaemon, si no recuerdo mal. Ya en Digimon World Re:Digitize Decode se revela que ni Taiga ni Rina han de asumir tales consecuencias gracias a la habilidad "Decode", aunque de esto no estoy 100% segura. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 22:24, 7 August 2019 (CDT)

Pues en CS Mirei declara que es ella misma la que lleva a cabo estos castigos y que es ella la que decide si eres castigado o no, por eso lo decía.

Do note that the punishment is for killing all seven demon lords, not defeating them. In the other games, they weren't killed, they were defeated. Sayo and Aiba killed them but in World DS, for example, they are not killed by the protag (and then Sayo killed them off screen at some point, leading into cyber sleuth). Another instance of them being killed is in World Data Squad, however they were killed by DATS as a group, not one person unlike Sayo and Aiba, so it didn't count for them. The thing about the multiverse power thing is also true, as in ReDigi, I believe Barbamon's plan is to kill the other six and absorb said power so he could power himself up (and all the other Barbamons from other universes).Muur (talk) 23:46, 7 August 2019 (CDT)

Arresterdramon SM

Hey there! Nice meeting you too. I haven't logged in for a while and I didn't get the notification, so I apologize for the late reply. Anyway, the line you gave me can best be translated to: "Realizing its true potential, Arresterdramon evolved to this higher form." 高次進化した literally reads as something like "higher-evolved" or "advanced-evolved" but as there's no proper English equivalent (and I didn't go with "super-evolved" because that's already a thing in Digimon Adventure) I just rearranged it a bit for legibility. Hope that helps. Valkyrimon (talk) 23:24, 7 October 2019 (CDT)

metalm

vaccine as copymon? not sure how that works exactly.Muur (talk) 09:12, 16 July 2020 (CDT)

Yep, according to humulos both Piccolomon and MetalMamemon work as both Data (raisable in both DM20th and Pen20th) and Vaccine (when transferred to the Pen20th as Copymon).

Jogress components providen by humulos:

Part 1

Part 2 (Copymon)

--Shadow Shinji (talk) 09:30, 16 July 2020 (CDT)

weird.Muur (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2020 (CDT)

and looks like meicoomon works for jogress as a copymon but not actual meicoomon herself. That I wasn't aware of. That adds meicoomon to every free requirement. I didn't have her on it as pendulum meicoomon says it can't jogress. I assumed that carried over to the copymon version too. Guess the kitty has some new evos.Muur (talk) 10:17, 16 July 2020 (CDT)

oh and he states super ultimate but it's ultimate+ so it's not SU.Muur (talk) 10:21, 16 July 2020 (CDT)

I think you should put a note on those kitty evos to specify it has to be a copymon meicoomon and that the normal one won't work Muur (talk) 10:21, 16 July 2020 (CDT)

Yeah, it's a bit weird. Evolution section-wise there's not really an actual difference between a Copymon and a normal one. Let's keep things simple because the whole Pen20th Jogress thing is by far the worst and most annoying editing I've done so far in this wikia. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 10:28, 16 July 2020 (CDT)

trust me, I know lmao. it took me weeks. ps unblock me from twitterMuur (talk) 11:01, 16 July 2020 (CDT)

V-Pet Jogress

Are the Jogress evolutions you're noting for the Ver. 20th all cases where the Digimon in question actually becomes the Digimon cited? I'm not familiar enough with the v-pets to know how it works, but I know in the original Pendulums you used two devices for Jogress, so each Digimon used evolved only to a Digimon in their version. --TMS (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2020 (EST)

Short answer: yes. I'm not really that familiar either with how the Jogress works in the Ver.20th, but basically you can fuse one Digimon you are raising in one device with another one raised in the same or other device in the form of Copymon also transferred from the DM Ver.20th. The difference between the Jogress in the original Pendulum and the Ver.20th is that in the original you can fill each component with for example a random Data Adult with another random Data Adult to get the evolved form, in the Ver.20th you have a core Digimon (Triceramon for instance) that you can fuse with another random Data Adult. Keep in mind in the Ver.20th you can raise two Digimon at the same time unlike thr original. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 17:25, 16 July 2020 (CDT)

Invitation

A Discord server for Wikimon and the Digimon Wiki has been made.

Wanna Join? Chimera-gui (talk) 18:57, 5 August 2020 (CDT)

That's a great idea! Count me in. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 20:42, 5 August 2020 (CDT)

Thanks, removing the invite since it was used. Chimera-gui (talk) 20:54, 5 August 2020 (CDT)

Development designs & names

As discussed in your talk page above, please do not add back development names (and designs) into the respective Digimon pages. Doing so will only make the difference between canon, actual names and unused names unclear and confusing, and also more difficult to search and find. Most of the unused names are not even specifically intended for the final designs anyway. Perhaps a separate page containing concept designs and names would be more beneficial and organized. Maybe try to refer to how other mon series treat this matter - Example 1 & Example 2 Luph (talk)

they were in a section titled "names during development." Seemes fine to me.Muur (talk) 05:45, 21 November 2020 (CST)

That assumes these names are applied to the final designs, in which some of them are not even true. For example, the development names for Omegamon and Chackmon are not even intended for the finalized designs, while developmental designs are scrapped in the end (those are and should be considered different Digimon together, not the same as the finalized version). Also, the etymology section does not have the distinction between the actual names and the developmental names either. Some of the developmental names are also uncited (which make it prone to rumors). There's also issue with the developmental designs being rather difficult to find as they are obscured in the miscellaneous tab on gallery instead. Luph (talk)

Greeting

Hi, Nice to meet you that you're great User. ^u^ --Dharakjoo (talk) 06:39, 27 December 2020 (CST)

Hello, nice to meet you too! I really appreciate your message. Let's get along well ^^ --Shadow Shinji (talk) 13:40, 29 December 2020 (CST)

Catherine Deneuve in Xros Wars Hunters

Is this resource an official site or is a fansite? https://digimonxrosfuse.weebly.com/catherine.html --Aiks (talk) 03:49, 27 May 2021 (CDT)

I'm going to delete that information for now.--Aiks (talk) 01:43, 28 May 2021 (CDT)

The site is not official. However, I recall back in the day the producer of the series stating the crossover was meant to entail all past Digimon main characters, so it's not a coincidence that Gaomon, Lalamon, Kudamon and Kamemon appear next to each other. Maybe Floramon is a bit of a stretch considering they are not main characters, but the evidence is there. Since it's not been officially confirmed, I think I may leave it as trivia in the respective pages. Thanks for your contribution. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 07:11, 28 May 2021 (CDT)

Digimon Profile 13

Hola Shinji, soy un seguidor tuyo de twitter desde hace rato y, primero que todo, quiero saber si hablas japonés de verdad, si respondes que si, que bien porque queria pedirte ayuda con una traducción del reporte 13 del Digimon Profile. La cosa es que según la discusión del articulo del Chrome Digizoid, el Chrondigizoit es el "Chrondigizoit Hybrid Organism alloy", no el Chrome, pero la fuente de esa info esta aparentemente muerta, así que pensé en editar/actualizar los artículos de ambos materiales basándome en el reporte. Revisando los kanjis y katakanas, sumado a traducciones del traductor de google, me di cuenta de que el reporte se refiere al "Chrondigizoit Hybrid Organism alloy" como el nombre oficial del Chrome Digizoid, confirmando que retconearon el lore de ambos materiales. Mi problema sabiendo esto radica en que mi conocimiento del japonés es nulo, y supuse que si no cambiaron nada para que encaje con el retcon mas allá de las listas de Digimon que contienen dichos metales sera por algo, pero no estoy seguro. Pregunté en la discusión del Chrondigizoit pero nadie me respondió, así que si no te es mucha molestia, ¿podrías traducir el reporte, o al menos dos párrafos del mismo para confirmar?--ImaginAlphamon (talk) 23:22, 11 October 2021 (CDT)

Hola, disculpa la tardanza, no sé si será demasiado tarde, recién veo este mensaje. ¿Puedes pasarme el enlace a ese reporte o alguna imagen sobre el mismo? Haré lo que pueda por ayudar por supuesto.

Actualización-- Es este, no? --Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2022 (CDT)

Jump Festa 22 Ghost Game Artwork

Hi, just one question: do you have all the images / artwork from the Ghost Game from Jump Festa 22 or only the ones that have already been uploaded ? (Just I'm really waiting to see the footage of Jellymon and Ruli.)

Hello. Unfortunately this is all I got, I extracted those images from people that visited the venue, and made a couple of retouches here and there by myself. Nevertheless, you can see all the artwork exhibited here. I hope they eventually release all of them in HD somehow. Hope it helps! --Shadow Shinji (talk) 17:29, 20 December 2021 (CST)

Thanks for finding Jellymon's artwork from Jump Festa ^^

Big Picture Book

TMS thinks that it might be better to make a page for the Big Picture Book so we can have all the page images in one place without cluttering the species pages. I'm not as adept at making pages for Wikimon however so I'd like your help and input. Chimera-gui (talk) 19:24, 12 July 2022 (CDT)

Hello Chimera. Yeah I think it's a good idea. The main reason I am keeping this scans on the different species pages, it's because I would like that gradually, all the artwork can be cropped and properly cleaned eventually. Especially the ones I uploaded yesterday, the ones with tiny artworks for different xrosses, I scanned them in HD with an external digital printing company, but the full scans are too big to get uploaded here, that's why I split each artwork into the different pages involved. That would be fairly difficult to achieve if the scans were in any other places on the wiki I am afraid. I think putting them into a gallery type of page that is linked to the main anime page a la Gallery:Digimon_Collectors/EX_Cards should be fairly easy. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 13:36, 13 July 2022 (CDT)

Appmon Manga Background References

Please explain these when you make changes to pages because of them, because just putting the title of the manga is misleading. Overdell Cemetery does not literally appear in the manga, etc. --TMS (talk) 21:02, 18 August 2022 (EST)

True, I will do that because these locations are mostly references. Also please don't remove changes like in the case of Patamon or Shoutmon just because you don't find the mon in the page or the link doesn't seem to work. You can ask me first. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 00:27, 19 August 2022 (CDT)

Well, in that case, please give me a working link to the Shoutmon cameo (or just the chapter and page). Both of the links you posted so far lead to error pages. --TMS (talk) 01:44, 19 August 2022 (EST)

There you go: https://mobile.twitter.com/Fairi_digimon92/status/1560389383534043136. I don't know why the error, when I posted the link it worked for me.

Also in this same vein, I would like to let you know that I see almost on a weekly basis here mistaken or misguided edits from users that are not regular editors here, or spontaneous edits with grammar errors or those that subvert several templates from many different pages by accident. I would appreciate if you could also catch those ones under your radar, since I see myself correcting those sometimes and no one else seems to notice them. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 00:53, 19 August 2022 (CDT)

Thank you. I correct any errors I notice, though since Survive came out I haven't been checking the wiki regularly. I'll be catching up on edits later, but yours happened to be mentioned to me. --TMS (talk) 02:01, 19 August 2022 (EST)

Thank you, I really appreciate it. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 08:42, 22 August 2022 (CDT)

Sorry to bug you about it, but it is MarineAngemon in the Appmon manga, and not something that just looks somewhat like it? --TMS (talk) 02:36, 25 September 2022 (EST)

Hello! No worries about that (^^) I think it definitely is, I recall those fish-shaped creatures from the anime as well lurking around the Deep Web (were them even named at any point?), and non of those were remotely similar to this particular one. It seems clear that Akamine was trying to just put an easter egg without making it too obvious, maybe because Marin Angemon is also a very particular translucent type of Digimon that resemble those somehow, same as with the other list of references/tributes/easter eggs the manga holds. I would personally put something like: "One of the fished-shaped creatures lurking around Cyber-Kowloon next to the Deep Web's entrance gate takes the form/is shaped after a faceless Marin Angemon". What do you think? --Shadow Shinji (talk) 09:10, 25 September 2022 (CDT)

Something like that, probably. --TMS (talk) 02:12, 26 September 2022 (EST)

Source on Apollomon/Dianamon Design Notes

Just wondering what your source was on that, since you didn't add one. --TMS (talk) 00:12, 13 September 2022 (EST)

Hi. Sure, I forgot. Is the interview to Ryo Mito in the Digimon Games Community website: http://digimon-game.bn-ent.net/free/detail.php?id=5

Here you have a translated version: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Executor_N0/Digimon_Franchise:_Digimon_Interview

--Shadow Shinji (talk) 23:58, 12 September 2022 (CDT)

Thank you. --TMS (talk) 01:25, 13 September 2022 (EST)

gracenova

what on that vjump page says it belongs to koh and sayo? it doesnt even tag it as night claw/light fang and the only part that has koh/sayo is them being in the bottom corner. a previous vjump did the same when it showed the diaboromon deck. showed armageddemon with arata in the corner and the wiki didnt count that as an evo of arata's digimon with this being an identical situation. tms's post in regards to this is "Maybe I'm missing it, but I only see Kou and Sayo mentioned on their card in the bottom left. I'm happy to go along with it if he can prove it."Muur (talk) 19:14, 27 August 2023 (CDT)

Hello. In the V-Jump scan both Apollomon and Dianamon that are partered to Koh and Sayo specifically, are shown merging into GraceNovamon, plus the Tamer Card of them being related to the jogress itself, let alone the deck being themed after them and Light Fang and Night Claw. To me it's pretty obvious this is a possible evolution for both of these characters, but if you want to dent the evidence up to you. I wasn't aware of the Armagemon case in particular, but the same rules should apply if it's the case. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (CDT)

Imo instances like this are more of "card synergy" show-offs (akin to the deck recipe suggestions from the TCG website) than something significant for the characters themselves. Sorry to come in uninvited, but still I wanted to leave some food for thought. ShikaSS (talk) 08:29, 28 August 2023 (CDT)

No worries about that, this is an open discussion. I think it can be read like that, in as long as they randomly would throw some regular art for both Apollomon and Dianamon to state that they can evolve into GraceNovamon in the TCG and the setting is not linked to Koh and Sayo specifically; but the way everything is put together it cannot be more different, since they are talking specifically about these characters, is not as different as for example this case of Adventure's Tailmon directly evolving into Ofanimon FM from the V-Jump as well. If they are using specifically these characters, to the point the Tamers are part of the deck an so are the rest of Apollomon's and Dianamon's line, to me it's more of a Light Fang's Coronamon and Night Claw's Lunamon can ultimately evolve all the way till GraceNovamon (and you can build a deck after those). They probably didn't tag GraceNovamon as part of Night Claw/Light Fang because maybe they are none of those, but their own unique evolution, ot maybe because simply GraceNova didn't appear in the original games and they prefer to appeal to older audiences with this callback. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 10:25, 28 August 2023 (CDT)

They wouldn't use "some regular art" for any of them because the page is promoting the latest expansion, so naturally they would use cards from the latest expansion. Again, as I see it there are no "characters" in the page, only cards. It's very different from the FM instance, where the subjects are actual characters and the page is specifically talking about plot points, not game mechanics. ShikaSS (talk) 16:38, 28 August 2023 (CDT)

leaving off light fang and night claw to me is a direct statement its not theirs, cuz itd have it otherwise. its not considered to be a member, so didnt evolve from the apllomon and dianamon of those two. if it said it, fair, but it doesnt. as for someoen jumping in, its fine thats what wikis are for. for others to post opinions. kryten said he doesn't think it counts either btw so theres a lot more against than for here.Muur (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2023 (CDT)

Itsuki Icon

Hi, Shinji. I've been playing the Appmon game and I'm taking some screenshots for my wiki, so I figured you'd like to have a bigger grab of Itsuki's icon (it's from the Player profile rather than the smaller icon from the AppTalk). Here's the link. If you'd like I can also share the rest of the screenshots to that folder once I finish triaging all the ones I have. ShikaSS (talk) 08:43, 28 August 2023 (CDT)

Oh, also, I would have taken a screenshot from Kazuki's icon, but the game only allows for 1 save file, so that will have to wait until I finish the game. ShikaSS (talk) 08:44, 28 August 2023 (CDT)

Hello Shika. That is super dope actually!! Please don't hesitate to do it, I will take care of editing and ultimately uploading the icons to the wiki (if you agree). I only have so far this sheet, but the quality is so utterly bad, that I feel kinda embarrassed to upload those to Wikimon ^^'. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 10:36, 28 August 2023 (CDT)

Of course, feel free upload anything you want here. I just don't do it myself because it's already tiring enough to do it for one wiki. I'm afraid most of the icons won't be much better than the ones you have, such is the 3DS curse. So far the only bigger icons are Itsuki's and (eventually) Kazuki's. Also, note that most of the icons you have are for the Appmon Chips themselves. I'll be uploading the dialogue icons (they are a bit different). ShikaSS (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2023 (CDT)

That sounds so good! I will be lookin forward to any update! Out of curiosity, may I ask you which is the other wiki you are running? I am a big fan of all your updates here in Wikimon. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 16:16, 29 August 2023 (CDT)

I have uploaded a few icons to the folder. Also I found a homebrew that allows me to backup multiple saves even if the game does not support that, so I'll be grabbing Kazuki's icon as well. As for your question, it's a EU portuguese wiki run by me and a friend, mostly for our enjoyment. ShikaSS (talk) 22:41, 29 August 2023 (CDT)

Wow there are more characters like Naoto and Mio and even different poses! That's so promising, I will keep an eye on this. I think I will eventually apply a sharpen tool to the icons to see if there's room for improvement; even if not, the way they are already presented is actually fine enough. Oh I knew the wiki!! Fantastic work there (^^) --Shadow Shinji (talk) 06:54, 30 August 2023 (CDT)

Dokamon Musimon Super Appliarise

I'm the one who misremembered and added those incorrectly. I am rewatching Appmon right now, and Gatchmon and Hackmon are the only 2 who use Super Appliarise. Musimon and Dokamon only ever AppGattai to reach Super Grade. I removed them because I was wrong to add them in the first place. KiraraKidohara (talk) 02:28, 18 September 2023 (CDT)

Hello there KiraraKidohara. Oh really? Not even in the episode debut of Tellermon? I might be wrong, but I recall their chips getting used...maybe I misremembered it. Anyways, if that's the case, please feel free to redo the edit again. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 04:13, 18 September 2023 (CDT)

Hi! :) I double-checked just to be safe. They AppFuse off-screen (after saying "let's AppFuse"). But, that is the episode they first gain access to their Super Appmon chips, and AppLink together. (Which is what I'd guess you're remembering.) And, after that they only ever become Dosukomon and Mediamon off-screen, they never AppFuse or Appliarise into them on-screen after that. I was sure, too, which was why I added it in the first place. But, while I haven't finished my rewatch, yet, I am at the point where they're consistently Appliarising straight to Ultimate, which seems like I was just wrong. I even did a search on Youtube, because you can always find evo sequences uploaded there, and the only Super Appliarise sequences are DoGatchmon and Raidramon. I intend to keep paying close attention while rewatching, but since I believe I was too hasty with the addition, I thought it would be better to remove it. Maybe there's a random episode in the 2nd half where they Super Appliarise, and if so, I'll add it back, but I think I was just wrong when I added it. Sorry for the inconvenience. KiraraKidohara (talk) 04:49, 18 September 2023 (CDT)

No worries about that, I really enjoy interacting with other users here. You are right about the Tellermon episode, I've been rewatching some scenes, and Dosukomon and Mediamon only appear again after episode 15 in the debut episodes of Oujamon and Entermon, episodes 21 & 20 respectively; in both cases, the Apprealization takes place off-screen. Anyways, since their chips are already activateed by then, can we assume that Dokamon and Musimon can be Cho Apprealized directly into Dosukomon and Mediamon, right? I mean based on what we see in the series, once a chip is activated, that particular Appmon can not be reached via other ways such as AppLink/AppGattai (eg. Raidramon). How do you feel about it?

Plus I have just checked in the manga, there is one scene in which Dokamon, Musimon and Hackmon directly evolve into Dosukomon, Mediamon and Raidramon without using AppGattai: Page 1 & Page 2.--Shadow Shinji (talk) 16:52, 18 September 2023 (CDT)

I do agree that the show is definitely implying that, and if you think it's appropriate, I'll add them back with those episodes as a reference. I'm just kinda new here, and I wasn't sure if I should be adding things that are only implied, even if obvious. But, you've been here longer than me. If you think it's appropriate, ,' defer to your experience. I haven't gotten around to reading the manga, yet, but I've been meaning to. Those pages do look very explicit. I'll add them back with that chapter as a reference! Thanks! And, if you think the episodes should be added as a reference, too, I'll add them once you get back to me! :) KiraraKidohara (talk) 07:10, 19 September 2023 (CDT)

Yep while in the anime it's pretty much obvious, I think the most clever way to go would be to quote the manga in which it is explicitly shown as you pointed out. I would totally recommend you the manga, it's a more abridged shonen-oriented versión with a few differences. It was so nice talking to you!!--Shadow Shinji (talk) 14:18, 19 September 2023 (CDT)

I love Appmon, so I definitely intend on reading it soon! Thanks for the advice! It was nice talking to you, too! :) KiraraKidohara (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2023 (CDT)

implication isnt really enough if something lke that was listed itd need a note saying its not officially confirmed, like one Zeromaru's page for his forms before champion or the survive cast's baby forms.Muur (talk) 18:20, 19 September 2023 (CDT)

I thought as much. That's good to know about though, incase a case like this comes up again, but thankfully this time there was an explicit instance of it happening in the manga to use as a reference so we could avoid any implications. KiraraKidohara (talk) 18:51, 19 September 2023 (CDT)

Mecha Rogue

Hey, did you get the guy’s permission to upload the Mecha Rogue images? I kinda want to use them for the Fandom wiki too Chimera-gui (talk) 14:14, 24 May 2024 (CDT)

Hello Chimera. Yes, he sent me personally all the material via Discord as well. I believe it shouldn't be a problem to use them on the Fandom wiki too.

https://twitter.com/Zeak6464/status/1793058999555756082

--Shadow Shinji (talk) 05:43, 25 May 2024 (CDT)

Wanted to be safe so thank you Chimera-gui (talk) 17:05, 25 May 2024 (CDT)

Recent Card Images

Just to be sure, are you supposed to upload the english cards here? ShikaSS (talk) 12:14, 4 June 2024 (CDT)

Hello Shika. Yes, if there is not a Japanese equivalent (so far), or the product came out in English first, or the available version in Japanese is in a very low resolution, I think it should be fine, like the parallel art for BT7-042_(DCG). --Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:19, 4 June 2024 (CDT)

The (so-far) english/chinese exclusives are a given, but the two english cards you uploaded from Premium Binder Set 2023 should not be here, I think. The ones we already had were not "very low resolution". Thanks for answering! ShikaSS (talk) 18:48, 4 June 2024 (CDT)

Oh that ones, well I thought that since both Japanese and English versions of the Binder Set were announced at the same time, and those are Western artists it should be fine, but the Japanese edits normally take the priority. If you feel like doing it, we can revert the images into their original Japanese versions too. What do you think? --Shadow Shinji (talk) 07:15, 5 June 2024 (CDT)

Yeah, I think we should stick to the most high-res japanese versions, where possible. Especially since the TCG is going to have simultaneous global releases from 2025 onwards, it's better not to look at release dates. ShikaSS (talk) 12:40, 5 June 2024 (CDT)

Collectors Card Images

What exactly are you doing with this? Because it looks like you're "fixing" something that's fine as it is. --TMS (talk) 21:54, 15 September 2024 (EST)

I can only assume your silence is due to it having been an amazingly pathetic attempt to make yourself look good by pretending to be the first person to upload the Collectors cards. If I'm wrong, let me know, but unless I'm given a good reason not to I'm going to start undoing the damage tomorrow, and there will be serious consequences if you're caught doing this sort of thing again. --TMS (talk) 11:42, 17 September 2024 (EST)

Hello. I have found an old file in which I had stored all the Collectors cards in a better quality from back then. The problem is that those are in .png, so if I change their format into .jpg, there's a slightly loss of quality, still better than the current .jpg version, that's why I came up with the conclusion that it would be better to reupload them in the .png format instead to preserve the quality. If you wanna make a quality check, I am already done with the 'Combination cards' section, so you may wanna compare any of them with the original file to see that they have way less noise, it's pretty evident if you look closer. I don't want to pretend that I uploaded them in the first place, why would I wanna do that to begin with? The only step I missed in the process is the "Originally uploaded by [user]" tag that we normally include in this procedures, but since there are so many different editors that contributed with all of the Collectors cards back in the day, it was a very time-consuming task, so I decided to do it step by step, as I am having more free time to do so moving forward. I was about to upload the missing cards, but my computer crashed the other day, that's why I couldn't do it yet, and I was kinda off of the site, but it should't take much more time to fix that up.

I really respect you as an editor, admin and long-time fan, but I am not going to tolerate the lingo you are using to refer to what I do like 'pathetic', even more before understanding my thought process behind it, so you may wanna keep yourself from using that kind of derogatory terms in the future. Even if I sometimes make mistakes like everyone else can do, I have been in the site long enough to not being treated like some kind of Internet troll. If it was a topic that couldn't be postponed, you could have also sent me a dm on Discord. I would appreciate that you may take this into consideration in the future. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 11:21, 17 September 2024 (CDT)

While I didn't send you a Discord DM, you were pinged on Discord twice, and didn't respond either time. Also, the alleged computer crashing just after I first posted here also seems rather convenient. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time, but you have to admit it looks bad (plus, it wouldn't be the first time you've done something morally questionable, like charging people for scans). The images you've uploaded do seem to be larger than the older JPGs, so you can carry on whenever your issues have been resolved. --TMS (talk) 12:28, 17 September 2024 (EST)

Sure, because computers never crash. I didn't see that mention on Discord, if that's the case then okay I trust you on that. I explained several times on my Twitter the reason why I decided to promote that campaign, that was, I had lost my job at the time, but eventually I found another one fairly quickly, so I decided to do it myself without asking anything to anyone (https://x.com/Fairi_digimon92/status/1479827904938786816). Which by the way, your friends on WtW are asking donations and promoting their own stuff for personal profit on the forums all the time, but I guess double standards apply here. I have contributed more to the wiki than most people here because of my love for Digimon, I don't expect you to thank me for anything, but at least show some respect when referring to me, I shouldn't be asking for something that obvious, but here we are.

Let me elaborate further on the subject, because I thought at first you were just referring to the RE/Cards in particular, the last ones I made. I have a file with all Standard, RE, and EX Collectors cards stored in .png format, similar resolution but with way less noise than the former versions on the site. With the EX cards in particular, after some attempts, I realized that the final .jpg version didn't carry as much noise as the RE ones when doing the conversion from .png to .jpg, I use Cloud Converter to do the conversion by the way, so I decided that they look just fine in .jpg with a slight resize. As for the RE cards, they look kinda bad when converting them into .jpg (let alone resize them), I guess it's because of the different artstyle used on them? I really dunno. Same happens with the combination cards. I won't be doing the task with the Standard ones, at least for now, because the artstyle is already common, so I don't see the same benefit on rescuing this art for reference purposes, as with the EX and RE cards. I hope I made my point clear enough. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 11:58, 17 September 2024 (CDT)

Reminder on Images

Please only upload and include on the Digimon pages art that has been used in some official capacity. Fan art produced independently by people who happen to have worked on the franchise should not be included. --TMS (talk) 21:14, 4 November 2024 (EST)

Hello. I understand, I thought it would be okay. Do you want me to remove the images completely, or gather those solely on the artist's bio?--Shadow Shinji (talk) 01:23, 5 November 2024 (CST)

Does he have his own page? I can't find it. --TMS (talk) 16:31, 5 November 2024 (EST)

Sasasi do you mean? --Shadow Shinji (talk) 07:45, 6 November 2024 (CST)

Yes. I wasn't sure what you meant by "the artist's bio", since he doesn't seem to have a page. --TMS (talk) 18:00, 6 November 2024 (EST)

sasasi. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 03:43, 11 November 2024 (CST)

There do seem to be a lot of "miscellaneous" images on that page; maybe more than we need. Has Bandai used any for promotion? --TMS (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2024 (EST)

As far as I know no, but sasasi has always been a reference artist in the Digimon community even before becaming part of the official staff, so showing part of his legacy is a nice way to fill out his bio and understand his impact among the fandom, especially considering we kinda apply the same policy with other artists here. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 01:01, 12 November 2024 (CST)

I guess if it's already been a thing for a while, then I don't mind letting it stand (at least until we start running out of memory). I would put under a "Fan Art" heading, though. --TMS (talk) 15:53, 12 November 2024 (EST)

isnt that just because youre the one who uploaded the pics for the other artists?Muur (talk) 15:44, 12 November 2024 (CST)

Gotcha. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 15:51, 12 November 2024 (CST)