Talk:Chronomon: Destroy Mode

Is there a Japanese text for this profile, or is it from the in-game gallery?KrytenKoro06 18:51, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea; I'm guessing that it's based on the text from DVR's Chronomon Destroy Mode page. --Ainz ^{( talk | contribs )} 21:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

TS

pretending the robot version is this verison is misleading and wrong. at te least there should be a destory mode (robot) page. the version you fight is *not* this one.Muur (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2025 (CDT)

Except it's not called "Robo". People are misinterpreting the datamine. "ChronomonRobo" is the internal name for the Giant Slayer. The internal name for the final boss Chronomon is "ChronomonBoss".

On top of that, the Time Stranger artbook explicitly labeled this new form as "Chronomon: Destroy Mode" (Source). So, while I agree that it's a different form, it's a form still called "Destroy Mode". If we must have a separate page for it, the name would be along the lines of "Chronomon: Destroy Mode (Time Stranger ver.)" or something along those lines.--YongYoKyo (talk) 22:49, 28 October 2025 (CDT)

Yeah no, I'm disinclined to consider this an actual species unto itself as well without evidence of acknowledgment as its own species Chimera-gui (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2025 (CDT)

I agree. Looking at the Time Stranger portrait, it seems like the same design as in Digimon Story, just with slightly different proportions. The difference is less pronounced than, say, the difference between WarGreymon's typical look and its appearance in Tri. --TMS (talk) 03:06, 29 October 2025 (EDT)

I’d rather it be on giant Slayers page. This is a robot DM. not a real DM. Also the real DM literally has a different art and model in TS. There’s not even evidence this one’s a digimon. were you looking at the playable dm? instead of the npc robot? Muur (talk) 02:50, 29 October 2025 (CDT)

the current version should be reasonable.Muur (talk) 03:24, 29 October 2025 (CDT)