Talk:Kemonogami

This should be a subsection of the Digimon article imho. Herb (talk) 10:21, 14 August 2022 (CDT)
 * I would agree, or at least this article being mentioned in the main one Digimon (species), but maybe some people don't, since unless there is an official and unmistakable statement that Kemonogami and Digimon are quintessential two ways to designate the same type of creature, some editors or fans in general will probably be against any kind of fan assumption or interpretation.
 * In theory, Digimon in the universe of Survive don't follow the general pattern or original concept of Digimon of "residing within the Digital World, and being originated from the Net Ocean" for being instead 'creatures that have existed from ancient times'. The other one great definition, the original one related to the first V-Pets, consisting of 'distinctive entities that self-evolve, and are seen as AI programs in the Digital World created by humans' is more widely spread and by definition should include Appmon as well, so it's a very tricky subject I would argue. --Shadow Shinji (talk) 18:05, 14 August 2022 (CDT)
 * See, I do not agree with the second definition and especially not the inclusion of Appmon since this definition has been long discarded by media at this point. The very idea of Appmon=Digimon is completely contradictory to actual Appmon media. When motherfucking Tamers is like 'No, humans did not create Digimon; that was complete fiction', it’s time to bury that definition altogether. Chimera-gui (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2022 (CDT)