Talk:Appmon

Power Chart
Social > Navi > Tool > System > Game > Life > Social

Attribute or Type?
Although this parameter has currently been referred to as "Type", the kanji used for it is the same as what is used for the Digimon parameter. Should we use "Attribute" or continue using "Type"? --Ainz ( talk 09:22, 21 July 2016 (CDT)

AppLink Uniqueness?
Should the different AppLink have their own page, or instead they should be merged with their respective base Appmon page (e.g. DoGatchmon Plus Dokamon just considered as DoGatchmon, or even a different kind of DoGatchmon within the same page)? In my case, I definetely opt for the latter. As far as I've seen of Cyber Arena, any Appmon can be combined with any other one by AppLink, so doesn't this take away their required uniqueness in order to be considered as a separate Digimon species? Just a thought. In any case I think it is an unprecedented case within the franchise. What do you think on this matter guys? --Shadow Shinji (talk) 11:35, 20 September 2016 (CDT)
 * idk about the others, but I agree with treating Applinked Appmon as just as extension of the original; so far they don't even have any differences from the original except another Appmon tagging along and being able to use its attacks? --Garmmon (talk) 09:17, 21 September 2016 (CDT)
 * Since AppLink is possible between all Appmon I think we should treat it as a general Appmon ability. Having the process being described on the Appmon page should suffice. ShikaSS (talk) 10:58, 21 September 2016 (CDT)
 * I also agree, the only form of Applinkng we should be really concerned with, espeically now, is App-fusion. As for stuff like card pages e.g. Dogatchmon Plus Dokamon, we could still have a category for cards with that name, but make it a subcategory of the original's. --Ainz ( talk 11:15, 21 September 2016 (CDT)