Talk:Dark Area (Iliad)

So... This page seems to be largely fanwank? The citations to Crusader chapters don't actually contain the information it claims they do? Anyone want to explain this, or should I just delete the page?
 * Each Digital World has its own Dark Area, including Iliad. Those are facts, not fan theories. I haven't checked the citations from Crusader yet, but erasing the page would imply erasing key information (just because you don't know how to handle it wiki-wise?). --Shadow Shinji (talk) 00:39, 12 December 2022 (CST)
 * If the Crusader stuff is bull (which, considering how short the cited "chapters" are, that would seem to be the case), then I don't see the point of the article, since it would merely be repeating information from the main Dark Area article. --TMS (talk) 03:07, 12 December 2022 (EST)
 * I don't see much of a problem deleting the last two paragraphs that talk about beelzemon and titamon since those are the ones with the less evidence, but the rest of the information is just factually true. We already know thanks to the Digimon Profile that each digital world has its own Dark Area, so the existance of the page is valid, no need to delete it. We also know from Plutomon's profile and from Digimon Crusader that Plutomon is the one who governs this specific Dark Area and what kind of methods he employs. Cerberusmon WW mode's profile also mentions its connection with the Dark Area, and since this digimon was created as Plutomon's pre evolution (and we see him take this form in Digimon Crusader) I don't see why we shouldn't include it in this page--Convergencia Digital (talk) 04:53, 12 December 2022 (CST)